Why do Tree Species Affect Soils? The Warp and Woof of Tree-soil Interactions

被引:41
作者
Dan Binkley
Christian Giardina
机构
[1] Colorado State University,Department of Forest Sciences and Graduate Degree Program in Ecology
来源
Biogeochemistry | 1998年 / 42卷
关键词
nutrient availability; soil development; tree-soil interactions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Many ideas have been advanced regarding how trees affect soils. Enough evidence is now available to evaluate the strength of these ideas and to consider interactions between tree species and soils in an evolutionary context. Forest floor mass commonly differs by about 20% for different species growing on the same site; differences of up to 5-fold have been reported. Litterfall mass and N content commonly differ by 20 to 30%, but larger differences are also common (especially with N-fixing species). The net mineralization of soil N typically differs by 50% or more among species, indicating very strong feedback possibilities. We evaluate the evolutionary context of tree effects on soils by considering 3 degrees of coupling of trees to soils: tightly woven connections where the fitness of the tree is enhanced by its effect on soils; loosely woven interactions where selection for tree fitness unrelated to soil properties leads to indirect effects on soils (either enhancing or impairing fitness); and frayed interactions where the effects of trees on soil derive from features of the ecosystem that do not involve direct selection for tree fitness. Evidence supports each of these degrees of interaction for at least some cases, and no single context explains all the interactions between trees and soils. Important areas for further work include: next-generation assessments of the effects of trees on soil suitability for the same (and different) species, and the role of soil organisms in developing and modifying the effects of trees on soils.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 106
页数:17
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]  
Bergkvist B(1995)The influence of tree species on acid deposition, proton budgets and element fluxes in south Swedish forest ecosystems Ecol. Bull. 44 90-99
[2]  
Folkeson L(1996)Bioassays of the influence of For. Ecol. Manage. 91 229-234
[3]  
Binkley D(1991)and For. Ecol. Manage. 40 13-25
[4]  
Binkley D(1989)on soil nutrient supply and limitation Biogeochemistry 7 131-145
[5]  
Valentine D(1990)Fifty-year biogeochemical effects of green ash, white pine, and Norway spruce in a replicated experiment Can, J. For. Res. 20 1320-1325
[6]  
Binkley D(1983)Nitrogen mineralization in high elevation forests of the Appalachians. I. Regional patterns in spruce-fir forests Oikos 40 357-368
[7]  
Valentine D(1994)Effect of soil changes caused by red alder ( Alaska. Ecol. Monogr. 64 149-175
[8]  
Wells C(1994)) on biomass and nutrient status of Douglas-fir ( For. Ecol. Manage. 70 299-310
[9]  
Valentine U(1994)) seedlings Plant Soil 164 51-59
[10]  
Brozek S(1993)Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory Ecology 74 513-527