A prospective randomized radiographic and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric study of migration and bone remodeling after implantation of two modern short-stemmed femoral prostheses

被引:44
作者
Brinkmann V. [1 ]
Radetzki F. [1 ]
Delank K.S. [1 ]
Wohlrab D. [1 ]
Zeh A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Ernst-Grube-Strasse 40, Halle/Saale
关键词
DEXA; Metha™; Nanos™; Short-stemmed prosthesis; Stress shielding;
D O I
10.1007/s10195-015-0335-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this prospective randomized study was to analyze migration and strain transmission of the Metha™ and Nanos™ femoral prostheses. Materials and methods: Between 1 January 2011 and 2 April 2013, 50 patients were randomized to receive short-stemmed femoral prostheses. Metha™ stems were implanted in 24 patients (12 female, 12 male; mean age 58.7 years; mean body mass index [BMI] 27.4) and Nanos™ stems in 26 patients (10 female, 16 male; mean age 59.7 years; mean BMI 27.1). Longitudinal stem migration, varus−valgus alignment, changes of center of rotation (COR), femoral offset and caput-collum-diaphyseal angle, leg length discrepancy, periprosthetic radiolucent lines incidence, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were analysed after an average of 98 and 381 days. Results: There was no significant change of varus−valgus alignment or clinically relevant migration of the Metha™ or Nanos™ prostheses during postoperative follow-up. After 12.3 months, the DEXA scans showed small but significant differences of bone mineral density in Gruen zones 1 (minus ~8 %) and 6 (plus ~9 %) for the Metha™ and in Gruen zone 1 (minus ~14 %) for the Nanos™ (paired t test). Visual analog scale (VAS) and Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved significantly for both implants (Nanos™/Metha™ 12.3 months postoperatively HSS 96.5/96.2; VAS 0.7/0.8, respectively). COR or offset did not change significantly after surgery. Conclusions: Neither implant showed signs of impaired osseointegration. DEXA demonstrated proximally located load transfer with only moderate proximal stress shielding. Level of evidence: II. © 2015, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 243
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
Gulow J., Scholz R., von Freiherr S.-S., Short-stemmed endoprostheses in total hip arthroplasty, Orthopade, 36, pp. 353-359, (2007)
[2]
Chen H.H., Morrey B.F., An K.N., Luo Z.P., Bone remodeling characteristics of a short-stemmed total hip replacement, J Arthroplasty, 24, pp. 945-950, (2009)
[3]
Falez F., Casella F., Panegrossi G., Favetti F., Barresi C., Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems, J Orthop Traumatol, 9, pp. 49-54, (2008)
[4]
Gilbert R.E., Salehi-Bird S., Gallacher P.D., Shaylor P., The mayo conservative hip: experience from a district general hospital, Hip Int, 19, pp. 211-214, (2009)
[5]
Gotze C., Ehrenbrink J., Ehrenbrink H., Is there a bone-preserving bone remodelling in short-stem prosthesis? DEXA analysis with the Nanos total hip arthroplasty, Z Orthop Unfall, 148, pp. 398-405, (2010)
[6]
Lerch M., der Haar-Tran A., Windhagen H., Behrens B.A., Wefstaedt P., Stukenborg-Colsman C.M., Bone remodelling around the Metha short stem in total hip arthroplasty: a prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study, Int Orthop, 36, pp. 533-538, (2012)
[7]
Zeh A., Pankow F., Rollinhoff M., Delank S., Wohlrab D., A prospective dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry study of bone remodeling after implantation of the Nanos short-stemmed prosthesis, Acta Orthop Belg, 79, pp. 174-180, (2013)
[8]
Von Salis-Soglio G., Gelenke G.J.G.ss., Hüfte: Kurzstiel, Gradinger H, Gollwitzer H, pp. S116-S119
[9]
Albanese C.V., Rendine M., De Palma F., Impagliazzo A., Falez F., Postacchini F., Villani C., Passariello R., Santori F.S., Bone remodelling in THA: a comparative DXA scan study between conventional implants and a new stemless femoral component. A preliminary report, Hip Int, 16, pp. 9-15, (2006)
[10]
Boden H.S., Skoldenberg O.G., Salemyr M.O., Lundberg H.J., Adolphson P.Y., Continuous bone loss around a tapered uncemented femoral stem: a long-term evaluation with DEXA, Acta Orthop, 77, pp. 877-885, (2006)