Comparative evaluation of a commercial system for identification of gram-positive cocci

被引:17
作者
Von Baum H. [1 ]
Klemme F.R. [1 ]
Geiss H.K. [1 ]
Sonntag H.-G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Institute of Hygiene, University of Heidelberg INF 324
关键词
Correct Identification; Test Panel; Commercial System; Extended Spectrum; Microbiology System;
D O I
10.1007/s100960050205
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The performance of a new commercial system for the identification of different groups of gram-positive cocci [BBL Crystal Gram-Positive (GP) Identification System; Becton Dickinson Microbiology Systems, Germany] was evaluated in comparison with two currently used commercial systems, the API Staph and the API Strep (bioMerieux Diagnostic, Germany). A total of 191 strains from seven different gram-positive genera comprising 32 different species were tested. For the BBL Crystal GP system, the correct identification rate without additional tests was 89.5% at the species level and 97.9% at the genus level. The findings suggest that the newly introduced BBL Crystal GP ID system provides an accurate method for the identification of gram-positive cocci, with an overall rate of correct species identification of about 90%, similar to that of the established API systems. Its major advantage is the extended spectrum of taxa included in a single test panel in contrast to the two different API test kits. Furthermore, the simplicity of use and the safe and rapid handling in a closed system conveniently accommodate existing laboratory workflow.
引用
收藏
页码:849 / 852
页数:3
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Ieven, M., Verhoeven, J., Pattyn, S.R., Goossens, H., Rapid and economical method for species identification of clinically significant coagulase-negative staphylococci (1995) Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 33, pp. 1060-1063
[2]  
Appelbaum, P.C., Chaurushiya, P.S., Jacobs, M.R., Duffett, A., Evaluation of the Rapid Strep system for species identification of streptococci (1984) Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 19, pp. 588-591
[3]  
Baker, J.S., Comparison of various methods for differentiation of staphylococci and micrococci (1984) Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 19, pp. 875-879
[4]  
Ruoff, K.L., Streptococcus (1995) Manual of Clinical Microbiology, pp. 299-307. , Murray PR (ed), American Society for Microbiology, Washington DC
[5]  
Cartwright, C.P., Stock, F., Fahle, G.A., Gill, V.J., Comparison of pigment production and motility tests with PCR for reliable identification of intrinsically vancomycin-resistant enterococci (1995) Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 33, pp. 1931-1933
[6]  
Weiss, N., The genera Pediococcus and Aerococcus (1992) The Prokaryotes, pp. 1502-1507. , Balows A (ed). Springer Verlag, New York
[7]  
Gemmell, C.G., Dawson, J.E., Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci with the API Staph system (1982) Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 16, pp. 874-877
[8]  
Soto, A., Zapardiel, J., Soriano, F., Evaluation of API Coryne system for identifying coryneform bacteria (1994) Journal of Clinical Pathology, 47, pp. 756-759
[9]  
Coykendall, A.L., Classification and identification of viridans streptococci (1989) Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 2, pp. 315-328
[10]  
Clarridge, J.E., Is species identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci necessary? (1983) Clinical Microbiology Newsletter, 5, p. 24