Elicitation Format and Sensitivity to Scope

被引:3
作者
Vivien Foster
Susana Mourato
机构
[1] World Bank,Department of Environmental Science and Technology
[2] Imperial College,undefined
关键词
charitable donations; choice experiments; contingent valuation; elicitation format; sensitivity to scope; willingness to pay;
D O I
10.1023/A:1022856329552
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper undertakes a systematiccomparison of the contingent valuation (CV) andchoice experiments (CE) methods, andinvestigates the extent to which either of themare affected by insensitivity to scope. This isachieved by undertaking separate CV estimatesof willingness to pay for two nested publicgoods, both of which are explicitly included ina parallel CE survey. The results indicate thatCE values exhibit greater sensitivity to scopethan CV values. CE gives significantly largerresults than CV for the more inclusive publicgood and significantly smaller results for theless inclusive public good.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 160
页数:19
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
Adamowicz W.(1998)Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80 64-75
[2]  
Boxall P.(1994)Combining Revealed and Stated Preference Methods Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 26 271-292
[3]  
Williams M.(1993)Report of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Panel on Contingent Valuation Federal Register 58 4602-4614
[4]  
Louviere J.(1979)Measuring Values of Extra-market Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? American Journal of Agricultural Economics 61 926-930
[5]  
Adamowicz W.(1996)A Comparison of Stated Preference Methods for Environmental Valuation Ecological Economics 18 243-253
[6]  
Louviere J.(1993)The Role of Question Order and Respondent Experience in Contingent Valuation Studies Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 25 80-89
[7]  
Williams M.(1987)Efficient Estimation Methods for Use with'Closed-Ended’ Contingent Valuation Survey Data Review of Economics and Statistics 69 269-276
[8]  
Arrow K.(1963)Recreation Planning as an Economic Problem Natural Resources Journal 3 239-249
[9]  
Solow R.(1984)Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses American Journal of Agricultural Economics 66 332-341
[10]  
Portney P.(1998)Contingent Valuation versus Choice Experiments: Estimating the Benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas in Scotland Journal of Agricultural Economics 49 413-428