Advanced ovarian cancer.

被引:23
作者
Chi D.S. [1 ]
Sabbatini P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, 10021, NY
关键词
Ovarian Cancer; Paclitaxel; Carboplatin; Epithelial Ovarian Cancer; Main Side Effect;
D O I
10.1007/s11864-000-0058-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
State-of-the-art treatment for advanced ovarian cancer requires a multimodality approach. Aggressive surgical debulking with the goal of optimal cytoreduction is the initial step. After primary cytoreductive surgery, standard treatment for patients with stage III and IV disease is systemic combination chemotherapy consisting of six cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin. Approximately 70% of patients enter a clinical remission with this approach, yet less than 30% remain disease free. Options following primary therapy include observation or second surgical assessment if no clinical evidence of disease is present. Novel strategies for consolidation are needed. Second-look surgery can be performed safely and effectively laparoscopically, and this is the most accurate means of identifying patients who appear to be clinically free of disease but actually harbor persistent cancer. Although this procedure is an extremely accurate means of identifying these patients, women who have pathologically negative second-look surgery are still at risk for relapse. Patients can receive additional treatment following second-look surgical assessment via the intraperitoneal route if they are pathologically negative or if they have microscopic or small volume disease. Alternatively, additional systemic chemotherapy can be given with non-cross-resistant systemic agents, but no current standard approach for consolidation therapy exists for patients following the completion of primary treatment. Unfortunately, most patients relapse. Multiple agents with similar activity in phase II trials are available to treat patients with advanced recurrent disease. Combination therapy in this setting has not been shown to have significantly superior progression-free or overall survival compared with single agents. The selection of treatment for patients with recurrent disease is currently based on a determination of the treatment-free interval since last treatment, as well as the route, schedule, and expected side effects of the agent.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 146
页数:7
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
Landis S(1999)Cancer Statistics 1999 CA Cancer J Clin 49 8-31
[2]  
Murray T(1996)Cyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patients with stage III and stage IV ovarian cancer N Engl J Med 334 1-6
[3]  
Bolden S(1999)Cisplatin/paclitaxel vs carboplatin/paclitaxel in ovarian cancer: an update of an Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Oncologie (AGO) Study Group Trial Proc ASCO 18 356(a)-356(a)
[4]  
McGuire WP(1999)Randomized phase III study of cisplatin (CIS)/paclitaxel (PAC) versus carboplatin (CARBO)/PAC in optimal stage III epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) Proc ASCO 18 356a-356a
[5]  
Hoskins WJ(1996)Second look operation for epithelial ovarian cancer Obstet Gynecol 88 549-553
[6]  
Brady MF(1998)A phase II trial of IP cisplatin and etoposide as consolidation therapy in patients with stage II-IV epithelial ovarian cancer following negative surgical assessment Gynecol Oncol 69 17-22
[7]  
DuBois A(1989)Influence of secondary cytoreduction at the time of second look laparotomy on the survival of patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma Gynecol Oncol 34 365-371
[8]  
Lueck HJ(1997)Dose-effect study of carboplatin in ovarian cancer: a Danish Ovarian Cancer Group Study J Clin Oncol 15 193-198
[9]  
Meier W(1997)A randomized trial of five versus eight courses of cisplatin or carboplatin in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma. A North Thames Ovary Group Study Ann Oncol 8 327-333
[10]  
Ozols RF(1997)Salvage weekly paclitaxel in recurrent ovarian cancer Semin Oncol 24 S62-S67