Testing the Mill hypothesis of fiscal illusion

被引:7
作者
Rupert Sausgruber
Jean-Robert Tyran
机构
[1] University of Innsbruck,Department of Public Economics
[2] University of St.Gallen,Department of Economics
来源
Public Choice | 2005年 / 122卷
关键词
Public Finance; Democratic Decision; Fiscal Illusion; Mill Hypothesis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
According to the “Mill hypothesis”, the tax burden from indirect taxation is underestimated because indirect taxes are less “visible” than direct taxes. We experimentally test the Mill hypothesis and identify tax framing as a cause of fiscal illusion. We find that the tax burden associated with an indirect tax is underestimated, whereas this is not the case with an equivalent direct tax. In a referendum to tax and redistribute tax revenue, fiscal illusion is found to distort democratic decisions and to result in “excessive” redistribution. Yet, voters eventually learn to overcome fiscal illusion.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 68
页数:29
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Boeri T.(2001)Welfare state reform. A survey of what Europeans want Economic Policy 32 9-50
[2]  
Börsch-Supan A.(2002)Tax liability-side equivalence in experimental posted-offer markets Southern Economic Journal 68 672-682
[3]  
Tabellini G.(2003)Lessons learned: Generalizing across games American Economic Review 93 202-207
[4]  
Borck R.(1985)Some hypotheses and evidence on tax knowledge and preferences Journal of Economic Psychology 6 271-287
[5]  
Engelmann D.(1996)The empirical analysis of fiscal illusion Journal of Economic Surveys 10 261-297
[6]  
Müller W.(1994)Direct democratic rules: The role of discussion Kyklos 47 341-354
[7]  
Normann H.-T.(1988)On the accuracy of tax perceptions Review of Economics and Statistics 70 344-347
[8]  
Cooper D.J.(2003)Tax perceptions and the demand for public expenditure: Evidence from UK micro data European Journal of Political Economy 19 793-816
[9]  
Kagel J.H.(1994)Experimental evidence of market reactions to new consumption taxes Contemporary Accounting Research 10 505-546
[10]  
Cullis J.(1991)New evidence on fiscal illusion American Economic Review 81 1336-1344