Manipulation of the follicular phase: Uterodomes and pregnancy - Is there a correlation?

被引:35
作者
Adams S.M. [1 ]
Gayer N. [1 ]
Terry V. [1 ]
Murphy C.R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Anatomy, University of Sydney, Sydney
关键词
Embryo Transfer; Follicular Phase; Natural Cycle; Uterine Epithelium; Endometrial Receptivity;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2393-1-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Manipulation of the follicular phase uterine epithelium in women undergoing infertility treatment, has not generally shown differing morphological effects on uterine epithelial characteristics using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and resultant pregnancy rates have remained suboptimal utilising these manipulations. The present study observed manipulation of the proliferative epithelium, with either 7 or 14 days of sequential oestrogen (E) therapy followed by progesterone (P) and assessed the appearance of pinopods (now called uterodomes) for their usefulness as potential implantation markers in seven women who subsequently became pregnant. Three endometrial biopsies per patient were taken during consecutive cycles: day 19 of a natural cycle - (group 1), days 11/12 of a second cycle after 7 days E then P - (group 2), and days 19/22 of a third cycle after 14 days E then P - (group 3). Embryo transfer (ET) was performed in a subsequent long treatment cycle (as per Group 3). Results: Seven pregnancies resulted in seven viable births including one twins and one miscarriage. Analysis of the individual regimes showed 5 days of P treatment to have a higher correlation for uterodomes in all 3 cycles observed individually. It was also observed that all 7 women demonstrated the appearance of uterodomes in at least one of their cycles. Conclusions: We conclude that manipulation of the follicular phase by shortening the period of E exposure to 7 days, does not compromise uterine epithelial morphology and we add weight to the conclusion that uterodomes indicate a receptive endometrium for implantation. © 2001 Adams et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]  
Rogers P., Murphy C., Cameron I., Leeton J., Hosie M., Beaton L., Macpherson A., Uterine receptivity in women receiving steroid replacement therapy for premature ovarian failure: Ultrastructural and endocrinological parameters, Human Reproduction, 4, pp. 349-354, (1989)
[2]  
Martel D., Monier M.N., Roche D., Psychoyos A: Hormonal dependence of pinopode formation at the uterine luminal surface, Human Reproduction, 6, pp. 597-603, (1991)
[3]  
Psychoyos A., Nikas G., Uterine pinopods as markers of uterine receptivity, Ass. Reprod. Rev., 4, pp. 26-32, (1994)
[4]  
Kolb B.A., Paulson R.J., The luteal phase of cycles utilizing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and the possible impact of this hyperstimulation on embryo implantation, American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 176, pp. 1262-1267, (1997)
[5]  
Paulson R.J., Sauer M.V., Lobo R.A., Potential enhancement of endometrial receptivity in cycles using controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with antiprogestins: A hypothesis, Fertility & Sterility, 67, pp. 321-325, (1997)
[6]  
Garcia-Velasco J.A., Simon C., Ardiles G., Neuspiller F., Remohi J., Nikas G., Assessment of endometrial responses to HRT using the detection of pinopods in women with endometriosis undergoing oocyte donation, Fertil. Steril., 70, SUPPL. 1, (1998)
[7]  
Nikas G., Pinopodes as markers of endometrial receptivity in clinical practice, Human Reproduction, 14, SUPPL. 2, pp. 99-106, (1997)
[8]  
Nikas G., Develioglu O.H., Toner J.P., Jones Jr. H.W., Endometrial pinopodes indicate a shift in the window of receptivity in IVF cycles, Human Reproduction, 14, pp. 787-792, (1999)
[9]  
Murphy C.R., Understanding the apical surface markers of uterine receptivity: Pinopods-or uterodomes?, Human Reproduction, 15, pp. 2451-2454, (2000)
[10]  
Psychoyos A., Hormonal control of uterine receptivity for nidation, Journal of Reproduction & Fertility, SUPPL., pp. 17-28, (1976)