River forcing at work: Ecological modeling of prograding and regressive deltas

被引:6
作者
Reyes E. [1 ]
Martin J.F. [2 ]
Day J.W. [3 ]
Kemp G.P. [4 ]
Mashriqui H. [4 ]
机构
[1] Coastal Ecology Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
[2] Dept. of Food, Agric. and Biol. Eng., Ohio State University, Columbus
[3] Coastal Ecology Institute, Dept. of Oceanogr. and Coast. Sci., Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
[4] Special Programs, School of the Coast and Environment, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge
关键词
Atchafalaya river; Coastal land loss; Delta growth; Landscape modeling; Louisiana; Mississippi river; Sea level rise;
D O I
10.1023/B:WETL.0000021663.50750.45
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two explicit landscape simulation models were used to investigate habitat shifts in coastal Louisiana due to varying river forcing and sea level rise scenarios. Wetland conversion to open water and yearly shifts of marsh habitats in two contrasting estuarine regions were examined; the Atchafalaya delta which is a prograding delta area with strong riverine input, and the Barataria Basin is a regressive delta with high wetland loss which is isolated from riverine input. The models linked several modules dynamically across spatial and temporal scales. Both models consisted of a vertically integrated hydrodynamic model coupled with process-based biological modules of above and below ground primary productivity and soil dynamics. The models explored future effects of possible sea level rise and river diversion plans for 30 and 70-year projections starting in 1988. Results showed that increased river forcing had large land preservation impacts, and indicated that healthy functioning of the Mississippi Delta depends largely on inputs of freshwater, nutrients, and sediments in river water. These types of models are useful for research and as management tools for predicting the effects of regional impacts on structural landscape level changes.
引用
收藏
页码:103 / 114
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Baumann R.H., Mechanisms for Maintaining Marsh Elevation in a Subsiding Environment, (1980)
[2]  
Baumann R.H., Day J.W., Miller C.A., Mississippi deltaic wetland survival: Sedimentation versus coastal submergence, Science, 224, pp. 1093-1095, (1986)
[3]  
Boesch D.F., Josselyn M.N., Mehta A.J., Morris J.T., Nuttle W.K., Simenstad C.A., Et al., Scientific assessment of coastal wetland loss, restoration and management in Louisiana, Journal of Coastal Research Special Issue No. 20, (1994)
[4]  
Boumans R.M.J., Day J.W., Effects of two Louisiana marsh management plans on water and material flux and short-term sedimentation, Wetlands, 14, pp. 247-261, (1993)
[5]  
Boumans R.M.J., Sklar F.H., A polygon-based spatial (PBS) model for simulating landscape change, Landscape Ecology, 4, pp. 83-97, (1990)
[6]  
Britsch L.D., Dunbar J.B., Land loss rates: Louisiana coastal plain, Journal of Coastal Resources, 9, pp. 324-338, (1993)
[7]  
Cahoon D.R., Recent accretion in two managed marsh impoundments in coastal Louisiana, Ecological Applications, 4, pp. 166-176, (1994)
[8]  
Cahoon D.R., Reed D.J., Day J.W., Estimating shallow subsidence in microtidal salt marshes of the southeastern United States: Kaye and Barghoorn Revisited, Marine Geology, 128, pp. 1-9, (1995)
[9]  
Chabreck R.H., Joanen J.T., Palmisano A.W., Vegetative Type Map of the Louisiana Coastal Marshes, (1968)
[10]  
Chabreck R.H., Linscombe G., Vegetative Type Map of the Louisiana Coastal Marshes, (1978)