Landslides qualitative hazard and risk assessment method and its reliability

被引：9

作者：

Ko Ko C. ^{[1
]}

Flentje P. ^{[2
]}

Chowdbury R. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Chit Engineering/Mining Geoserv, Sydney

[2] University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW

来源：

Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment | 2004年 / 63卷 / 02期

关键词：

Influencing factors; Landslide hazard; Observational approach; Qualitative and quantitative methods; Risk assessment; Slope stability;

D O I：

10.1007/s10064-004-0231-z

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Landslide hazard and risk assessment methods can be broadly characterised as site specific or area specific. Site specific assessments may be qualitative (denoted Type I) or quantitative-based on detailed investigation and data (Type III). Area specific assessments are denoted as Type II. This paper describes the University of Wollongong Type I method which analyses hazard and risk assessment for four different conditions: natural slopes, embankments and side fills, rock slopes and cuttings and soil cuttings. Field sheets have been developed for each type of slope to enable scoring of the factors contributing to hazard and to consequence and therefore to risk. These have been tested at 23 sites in New South Wales, Australia, by two independent professionals to establish consistency levels. Some Type III assessments have been made against which the Type I assessments were compared. In the three areas reported, the comparisons indicate that the qualitative approach is conservative. © Springer-Verlag 2004.

引用

页码：149 / 165

页数：16

共 27 条

[1] Anbalagan R., Terrain evaluation and landslide hazard zonation for environmental regeneration and land use planning in mountainous terrain, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Landslides, 2, pp. 861-868, (1992)
[2] Berkman D.A., Engineering Geology: Field Geologist's Manual, pp. 274-302, (1995)
[3] Chang S.C., The simprecise mapping and evaluation system for engineering geological and landslide hazard zonation, Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Landslides, 2, pp. 905-910, (1992)
[4] Chowdhury R.N., Flentje P.N., Ko Ko C., Aspects of recent landslide research at the University of Wollongong, Landslides, pp. 17-23, (1999)
[5] Cruden D.M., Varnes D.J., Landslide types and processes, Landslides Investigation and Mitigation Special Report 247, pp. 36-75, (1996)
[6] Fell R., Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk, Can Geotech J, 31, pp. 261-272, (1974)
[7] Flentje P., Chowdhury R.N., Ko Ko C., A matrix approach for assessing landslide risk in the context of a comprehensive strategy, GeoEng 2000, an International Conference on Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 2, (2000)
[8] Hoek E., Brown E.T., Classification of Rock Masses: Underground Excavations in Rock, pp. 14-37, (1994)
[9] Jhingran V., Mukherjee D., Engineering geological approach for the assessment of hazard, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Landslides, 1, pp. 239-244, (1996)
[10] Koirala N.P., Watkins A.T., Bulk appraisal of slopes in Hong Kong, Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Landslides, 2, pp. 1181-1186, (1988)

← 1 2 3 →