Passive Compliance from Robot Limbs and its Usefulness in Robotic Automation

被引:13
作者
Marcelo H. Ang Jr.
Wei Wang
Robert N. K. Loh
Teck-Seng Low
机构
[1] National University of Singapore,Department of Mechanical and Production Engineering
[2] School of Engineering and Computer Science,Center for Robotics and Advanced Automation
[3] Oakland University,Department of Electrical Engineering
[4] National University of Singapore,undefined
关键词
flexible robot; passive compliance; stiffness matrix; robot compliance;
D O I
10.1023/A:1007952828908
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Robots have been traditionally used as positioning devices without muchregard to external forces experienced by the tool. This has limited furtherpotential applications of robots in automation. Most tasks that remain to beautomated require constrained robot motion and/or involve work done by therobot on the environment. Such tasks require both force and positioncontrol. The ability to control the end-effector compliance is critical tosuccessful force and position control tasks. Although the end-effectorcompliance can be actively controlled through the joint flexibilitiesprovided by the joint servos or by active force sensing, the usefulness ofhaving the minimum passive compliance in addition to active compliancecontrol can improve performance. In surface following, for example, it isnecessary to make the end-point of a robot have the right compliance toprevent jamming. The usefulness of passive compliance has been demonstratedby the use of compliance-devices on the robot end-effector such as theRemote Center Compliance. The natural compliance inherent in light weightand flexible robot structures, however, can be exploited to provide thenecessary passive compliance required.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 21
页数:20
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Mason M. T.(1981)Compliance and force control for computer controlled manipulators IEEE Trans. Systems Man Cybernet 11 418-432
[2]  
Raibert M. H.(1981)Hybrid position/force control of manipulators Transactions of ASME, Journal of Dynamics Systems, Measurement and Control 102 126-133
[3]  
Craig J. J.(1988)Compliant robot motion I. A formalism for specifying compliant motion tasks International Journal on Robotics Research 7 3-17
[4]  
Schutter J. D.(1977)Force-feedback control of manipulator fine motions ASME Journal of Dynamic System, Measurement, and Control 98 91-97
[5]  
Van Brussel H.(1985)Impedance control: an approach to manipulation: Part I–theory Transactions of ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurements and Control 107 1-7
[6]  
Whitney D. E.(1988)Direct drive active compliant end-effector (active RCC) International Juournal of Robotics and Automation 4 324-333
[7]  
Hogan N.(1991)A six-degree-of-freedom magnetically levitated variable compliance fine motion wrist: design, modeling and control IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 7 320-332
[8]  
Kazerooni H.(1982)Quasi-static assembly of compliantly supported rigid parts Transactions of ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 104 65-77
[9]  
Hollis R. L.(1988)An investigation into the compliance of SCARA robots, Parts I–II Transactions of ASME, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 110 18-22
[10]  
Salcudean S. E.(1993)Structure of robot compliance Transactions of ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design 115 576-580