A new measure of patient satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications: The Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSS-IOP)

被引:44
作者
Mark J Atkinson
William C Stewart
Joel M Fain
Jeanette A Stewart
Ravinder Dhawan
Essy Mozaffari
Jan Lohs
机构
[1] Worldwide Outcomes Research, Pfizer, La Jolla, CA
[2] Pharmaceutical Reseach Network, Univ. of S. Carolina School of Med., Charleston, SC
[3] Pfizer Global Pharmaceuticals, New York, NY
[4] Clinical Project Management, Pharmaceutical Research Network, Charleston, SC
[5] Lohs Research Group, Palatine, IL
关键词
Glaucoma; Treatment Satisfaction; Ocular Hypertension; Brimonidine; Dorzolamide;
D O I
10.1186/1477-7525-1-67
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: To validate the treatment-specific Treatment Satisfaction Survey for Intraocular Pressure (TSSIOP). Methods: Item content was developed by 4 heterogeneous patient focus groups (n = 32). Instrument validation involved 250 patients on ocular hypotensive medications recruited from ophthalmology practices in the Southern USA. Participants responded to demographic and test questions during a clinic visit. Standard psychometric analyses were performed on the resulting data. Sample: Of the 412 patients screened, 253 consented to participate, and 250 provided complete datasets. The sample included 44% male (n = 109), 44% Black (n = 109) and 57% brown eyed (n = 142) participants, with a mean age of 64.6 years (SD 13.1) and a history of elevated IOP for an average of 8.4 yrs (SD 7.8). A majority was receiving monotherapy (60%, n = 151). Results: A PC Factor analysis (w/ varimax rotation) of the 31 items yielded 5 factors (Eigenvalues > 1.0) explaining 70% of the total variance. Weaker and conceptually redundant items were removed and the remaining 15 items reanalyzed. The satisfaction factors were; Eye Irritation (EI; 4 items), Convenience of Use (CofU; 3 items), Ease of Use (EofU; 3 items), Hyperemia (HYP; 3 items), and Medication Effectiveness (EFF; 2 items). Chronbach's Alphas ranged from .80 to .86. Greater distributional skew was found for less common experiences (i.e., HYP & EI with 65% & 48.4% ceilings) than for more common experiences (i.e., EofU, CofU, EFF with 10.8%, 20.8% & 15.9% ceilings). TSS-IOP scales converged with conceptually related scales on a previously validated measure of treatment satisfaction, the TSQM (r = .36 to .77). Evidence of concurrent criterion-related validity was found. Patients' symptomatic ratings of eye irritation, hyperemia and difficulties using the medication correlated with satisfaction on these dimensions (r = .30-.56, all p < .001). Clinicians' ratings of IOP control, severity of side effects and problematic medication use correlated with patients' satisfaction scores on these dimensions (r = .13-.26, all p < .01). Conclusions: This study provides initial evidence that the TSS-IOP is a reliable and valid measure, assessing patients' satisfaction with ocular hypotensive medications. © 2003 Atkinson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Katz J.N., Patient preferences and health disparities, JAMA, 286, 12, pp. 1506-1509, (2001)
[2]  
Owens D.K., Spine update. Patient preferences and the development of practice guidelines, Spine, 23, 9, pp. 1073-1079, (1998)
[3]  
Eriksen L.R., Patient satisfaction with nursing care: Concept clarification, Journal of Nursing Measurement, 3, 1, pp. 59-76, (1995)
[4]  
Report: A decisive step towards the recognition of patient reported outcomes in clinical trials, QoL Newsletter, 26, pp. 24-25, (2001)
[5]  
Morris L.A., Burke L.B., Outcomes research: An FDA perspective, Journal of Research in Pharmaceutical Economics, 8, 1, pp. 209-213, (1996)
[6]  
Burke L.B., US regulation of pharmaceutical outcomes research, Value in Health, 4, pp. 5-7, (2001)
[7]  
Gattellari M., Butow P.N., Tattersall M.H., Sharing decisions in cancer care, Social Science & Medicine, 52, 12, pp. 1865-1878, (2001)
[8]  
Turnbull J.E., Luther K.M., Patient satisfaction report paves way to improved care, QRC Advisor, 13, 1, pp. 1-7, (1996)
[9]  
Wright J.G., Evaluating the outcome of treatment. Shouldn't We be asking patients if they are better?, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53, 6, pp. 549-553, (2000)
[10]  
Brody D., Miller S., Lerman C., Smith D., Caputo G., Patient perception of involvement in medical care: Relationship to illness attitudes and outcomes, Journal of General Internal Medicine, 4, pp. 506-511, (1989)