Evolution of Bone Grafting: Bone Grafts and Tissue Engineering Strategies for Vascularized Bone Regeneration

被引:76
作者
Griffin K.S. [1 ]
Davis K.M. [1 ]
McKinley T.O. [1 ]
Anglen J.O. [1 ]
Chu T.-M.G. [2 ]
Boerckel J.D. [3 ]
Kacena M.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, 1120 South Drive FH 115, Indianapolis, 46202, IN
[2] Department of Restorative Dentistry, Indiana University School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, IN
[3] Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, 142 Multidisciplinary Research Bldg, Notre Dame, 46556, IN
来源
Clinical Reviews in Bone and Mineral Metabolism | 2015年 / 13卷 / 4期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Allograft; Autograft; Bone tissue engineering; Endothelial cells; Growth factors; Mesenchymal stem cells; Scaffold; Vascularization;
D O I
10.1007/s12018-015-9194-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The regeneration of bone in segmental defects has historically been a challenge in the orthopedic field. In particular, a lack of vascular supply often leads to nonunion and avascular necrosis. While the gold standard of clinical care remains the autograft, this approach is limited for large bone defects. Therefore, allograft bone is often required for defects of critical size though a high complication rate is directly attributable to their limited ability to revitalize, revascularize, and remodel resulting in necrosis and re-fracture. However, emerging insights into the mechanisms of bone healing continue to expand treatment options for bony defects to include synthetic materials, growth factors, and cells. The success of such strategies hinges on fabricating an environment that can mimic the body’s natural healing process, allowing for vascularization, bridging, and remodeling of bone. Biological, chemical, and engineering techniques have been explored to determine the appropriate materials and factors for potential use. This review will serve to highlight some of the historical and present uses of allografts and autografts and current strategies in bone tissue engineering for the treatment for bony defects, with particular emphasis on vascularization. © 2015, Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 244
页数:12
相关论文
共 166 条
[1]
Donati D., Zolezzi C., Tomba P., Vigano A., Bone grafting: historical and conceptual review, starting with an old manuscript by Vittorio Putti, Acta Orthop, 78, 1, pp. 19-25, (2007)
[2]
de Boer H.H., The history of bone grafts, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 226, pp. 292-298, (1988)
[3]
Ng V.Y., Risk of disease transmission with bone allograft, Orthopedics., 35, 8, pp. 679-681, (2012)
[4]
Kinaci A., Neuhaus V., Ring D.C., Trends in bone graft use in the United States, Orthopedics, 37, 9, pp. e783-e788, (2014)
[5]
Campbell W., Transference of the fibula as an adjunct to a free bone graft, J Orthop Surg, 1, pp. 625-631, (1919)
[6]
Stone J.S., Partial loss of the tibia replaced by transfer of the fibula, with maintenance of both malleoli of the ankle, Ann Surg, 46, 4, pp. 628-634, (1907)
[7]
Flierl M.A., Smith W.R., Mauffrey C., Irgit K., Williams A.E., Ross E., Et al., Outcomes and complication rates of different bone grafting modalities in long bone fracture nonunions: a retrospective cohort study in 182 patients, J Orthop Surg Res, 8, (2013)
[8]
Shafiei Z., Bigham A.S., Dehghani S.N., Nezhad S.T., Fresh cortical autograft versus fresh cortical allograft effects on experimental bone healing in rabbits: radiological, histopathological and biomechanical evaluation, Cell Tissue Bank., 10, 1, pp. 19-26, (2009)
[9]
Kienapfel H., Sumner D.R., Turner T.M., Urban R.M., Galante J.O., Efficacy of autograft and freeze-dried allograft to enhance fixation of porous coated implants in the presence of interface gaps, J Orthop Res, 10, 3, pp. 423-433, (1992)
[10]
Johnson A.L., Stein L.E., Morphologic comparison of healing patterns in ethylene oxide-sterilized cortical allografts and untreated cortical autografts in the dog, Am J Vet Res, 49, 1, pp. 101-105, (1988)