Economic and environmental evaluation of variable rate nitrogen and lime application for claypan soil fields

被引:34
作者
Dechun Wang
Tony Prato
Zeyuan Qiu
Newell R. Kitchen
Kenneth A. Sudduth
机构
[1] School of Accountancy, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia
[2] Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia
[3] Program in Environ. Policy Studies, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark
[4] USDA-ARS Cropping Syst./Water Q., Columbia
关键词
Claypan soils; Profitability; Variable rate technology; Water quality;
D O I
10.1023/A:1021858921307
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Variable Rate Technology (VRT) has the potential to increase crop yields and improve water quality relative to Uniform Rate Technology (URT). The effects on profitability and water quality of adopting VRT for nitrogen (N) and lime were evaluated for corn production on four claypan soil fields in north central Missouri under average to better than average weather conditions. Variable N and lime rates were based on measured topsoil depth and soil pH, respectively. VRT rates were compared to two different uniform N applications (URT-NI based on the topsoil depth within these claypan soil fields, and URT-N2 based on a typical N rate for corn production in this area). Expected corn yield was predicted based on topsoil depth, soil pH, N rate, and lime rate. Water quality benefits of VRT relative to URT were evaluated based on potential leachable N. Sensitivity analyses were performed using simulated topsoil data for topsoil depth and soil pH. Results showed that VRT was more profitable than URT in the four sample fields under URT-NI. and in two of the four fields under URT-N2. Greater variation in topsoil depth and soil pH resulted in higher profitability and greater water quality benefits with VRT. Results support adoption of VRT for N and lime application for other claypan soil fields with characteristics similar to those in the fields used in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 52
页数:17
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Adams F., Martin J.B., Liming effects on nitrogen use and efficiency, Nitrogen in Crop Production, pp. 417-426, (1984)
[2]  
Alberts E.E., Prato T., Kitchen N.R., Blevins D.W., Research and education to improve surface and ground water quality of a claypan soil, Proceedings of Agricultural Research to Protect Writer Quality Conference, pp. 21-33, (1993)
[3]  
Babcock B.A., Pautsch G.R., Moving from uniform to variable fertilizer rates on Iowa corn: Effects on rates and returns, Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 23, 2, pp. 385-400, (1998)
[4]  
Birrell S.J., Sudduth K.A., Kitchen N.R., Nutrient mapping implications of short-range variability, Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Precision Agriculture, pp. 207-216, (1996)
[5]  
Brown J.R., Rodiguez R.R., Soil Testing in Missouri: A Guide for Conducting Soil Tests in Missouri, (1983)
[6]  
Buchholz D.D., Brown J.R., Garrett J.D., Hanson R.G., Wheaton H.N., Soil Test Interpretations and Recommendations Handbook, (1983)
[7]  
Doerge T., EC Mapping Helps Farmers Know Soil, 18, 2, (2000)
[8]  
Doolittle J.A., Sudduth K.A., Kitchen N.R., Indorante S.J., Estimating depths to claypans using electromagnetic induction methods, Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 49, pp. 572-575, (1994)
[9]  
English C.B., Mahajanashetti S.B., Roberts R.K., Economics and environmental benefit of variable rate application of nitrogen to corn fields: Role of variability and weather, American Agricultural Economics Association Meeting, (1999)
[10]  
Fiez T.E., Miller B.C., Pan W.L., Assessment of spatially variable nitrogen fertilizer management in winter wheat, Journal of Production Agriculture, 7, pp. 86-93, (1994)