Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a literature review

被引:22
作者
Camarda L. [1 ]
D’Arienzo A. [1 ]
Morello S. [1 ]
Peri G. [2 ]
Valentino B. [2 ]
D’Arienzo M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Clinica Ortopedica e Traumatologica, Dipartimento di Discipline Chirurgiche, Oncologiche e Stomatologiche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro, Palermo
[2] Dipartimento di Biomedicina Sperimentale e Neuroscienze Cliniche, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Palermo
关键词
Patient-specific instrumentation; PSI; TKA; Total knee arthroplasty;
D O I
10.1007/s12306-014-0339-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
During the past decade, total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been markedly increased. Recently, patient-specific custom cutting guides have been commercially introduced in order to achieve an accurate component alignment during TKA. In fact, these cutting blocks are specific to a patient’s knee anatomy and should help the surgeons to perform bone cuts, reducing the complexity of conventional alignment and sizing tools. Nevertheless, there are critical arguments against patient-specific cutting guides for routine use, such as poor evidence and higher costs. Additionally, there are still no mild and long-term results available that describe the clinical outcomes following patient-specific instrumentation of TKR, cost-effectiveness and lower revision rates. Aim of the current manuscript was to describe the recent improvements of the surgical technique and instrumentation of TKA, reviewing the recent literature concerning the PSI technology. © 2014, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 18
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]
Anderson K.C., Buehler K.C., Markel D.C., Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: comparison with conventional methods, J Arthroplasty, 20, pp. 132-138, (2005)
[2]
Anouchi Y.S., Whiteside L.A., Kaiser A.D., Milliano M.T., The effects of axial rotational alignment of the femoral component on knee stability and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty demonstrated on autopsy specimens, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 287, pp. 170-177, (1993)
[3]
Bali K., Walker P., Bruce W., Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty: our initial experience in 32 knees, J Arthroplasty, 27, pp. 1149-1154, (2012)
[4]
Barrett W., Hoeffel D., Dalury D., Mason J.B., Murphy J., Himden S., In-vivo alignment comparing patient specific instrumentation with both conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 29, pp. 343-347, (2014)
[5]
Bathis H., Perlick L., Tingart M., Luring C., Zurakowski D., Grifka J., Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 86, pp. 682-687, (2004)
[6]
Boonen B., Schotanus M.G., Kerens B., van der Weegen W., van Drumpt R.A., Kort N.P., Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 21, pp. 2206-2212, (2013)
[7]
Catani F., Biasca N., Ensini A., Et al., Alignment deviation between bone resection and final implant positioning in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 90, pp. 765-771, (2008)
[8]
Chareancholvanich K., Narkbunnam R., Pornrattanamaneewong C., A prospective randomised controlled study of patient-specific cutting guides compared with conventional instrumentation in total knee replacement, Bone Joint J, 95-B, pp. 354-359, (2013)
[9]
Chauhan S.K., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., Beaver R.J., Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 86, pp. 372-377, (2004)
[10]
Chen J.Y., Yeo S.J., Yew A.K., Et al., The radiological outcomes of patient-specific instrumentation versus conventional total knee arthroplasty, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 22, pp. 630-635, (2014)