Among-environment heteroscedasticity and the estimation and testing of genetic correlation

被引:7
作者
Dutilleul P. [1 ]
Carrière Y. [2 ]
机构
[1] Department of Plant Science, McGill University, Macdonald Campus, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, Que. H9X 3V9
[2] Centre de Recherche en Horticulture, Université Laval, Pavillon Envirotron, Que. G1K 7P4, Cité universitaire
关键词
Among-environment heteroscedasticity; Genetic correlation; Phenotypic plasticity; Variance-stabilizing transformation;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00267.x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The genetic correlation between a character in two environments is of considerable interest in the context of plant and animal breeding for the prediction of evolutionary trajectories and for the evaluation of the amount of genetic variance maintained at equilibrium in subdivided populations. The two-way analysis of variance with genotype and environment as crossed factors is the usual basis for estimating this genetic correlation. In plasticity experiments, the genetic variance can differ widely between environments, for instance when the variance component associated with the genotype-environment interaction is not constant over environments. When this is the case, the assumption of homoscedasticity is violated, and the ANOVA method tends to underestimate the absolute value of the genetic correlation. To solve this problem, a variance-stabilizing transformation previously applied in a multivariate ANOVA context was developed. This development resulted in a new procedure (method 3), in which the genetic correlation is estimated from the transformed data (i.e. after among-environment heteroscedasticity is removed, while the within-environment means are maintained). In a simulation study and an analysis of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii growth rate data, we compared method 3 with two existing methods in which the genetic correlation is estimated from the raw data. Method 1 uses one 'global' variance component associated with the genotype-environment interaction, and method 2 uses two variance components associated with the genotype and obtained from one-way ANOVAS conducted separately in the two environments. Under increasing among-environment heteroscedasticity, method 1 produces increasingly biased genetic correlation estimates, whereas method 3 almost consistently provides accurate estimates; the performance of method 2 is intermediate, with more estimates out of range or indeterminate. This is the first demonstration that a variance-stabilizing transformation of the data removes the bias in the estimation of genetic correlation caused by among-environment heteroscedasticity, while allowing valid statistical testing in an ANOVA-based approach.
引用
收藏
页码:403 / 413
页数:10
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Bell G., The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. I. Genotype-by-environment interaction among pure strains, Proc. R. Soc. B, 240, pp. 295-321, (1990)
[2]
Bell G., The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. III. Genotype-by-environment interaction within strains, Evolution, 45, pp. 668-679, (1991)
[3]
Bell G., The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. V. The relationship between genetic correlation and environmental variance, Evolution, 46, pp. 561-566, (1992)
[4]
Bell G., Lechowicz M.J., Spatial heterogeneity at small scales and how plants respond to it, Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants: Ecophysiological Processes above and below Ground, pp. 391-414, (1994)
[5]
Dutilleul P., Potvin C., Among-environment heteroscedasticity and genetic autocorrelation: Implications for the study of phenotypic plasticity, Genetics, 139, pp. 1815-1829, (1995)
[6]
Falconer D.S., The problem of environment and selection, Am. Nat., 86, pp. 293-298, (1952)
[7]
Falconer D.S., Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 3rd Edn., (1989)
[8]
Fernando R.L., Knights S.A., Gianola D., On a method of estimating the genetic correlation between characters measured in different environmental units, Theor. Appl. Genet., 67, pp. 175-178, (1984)
[9]
Fry J.D., The mixed-model analysis of variance applied to quantitative genetics: Biological meaning of the parameters, Evolution, 46, pp. 540-550, (1992)
[10]
Fry J.D., Heinsohn S.L., Mackay T.F.C., The contribution of new mutations to genotype-environment interaction for fitness in Drosophila melanogaster, Evolution, 50, pp. 2316-2327, (1996)