Knowledge as a Path-Dependence Process

被引:18
作者
Salvatore Rizzello
机构
[1] Università del Piemonte orientale,Centre for Cognitive Economics, Department of Economics
关键词
brain; cognitive economics; creativity; endogenous change; entrepreneurship; Hayek; learning; mind; neurobiology; neuroeconomics; perception;
D O I
10.1007/s10818-004-2925-5
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
By following a new approach proposed by Cognitive and Neuroeconomics, this paper presents and extends that part of Hayek's theory concerning knowledge in path-dependent terms, and shows that this is a fertile theory, opening new lines of inquiry for contemporary economics. In his theory of knowledge Hayek shows that the dynamics of economic change is path-dependent, in a different and more profound way than in the rest of the path-dependent literature. This literature deals with an important controversy, which will be also discussed and its specific and original meaning will be highlighted. As it will emerge, knowledge as a path-dependent process is consistent with cognitive theories of perception and learning and it plays a more important role than is traditionally assumed. Path-dependence is in fact always present in the cognitive dimension of perception and in individual decision-making processes, as well as in the processes of organizational innovation, and even in the macro-dimension of institutional change.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 274
页数:19
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Antonelli C.(1995)The economics of path-dependence in industrial organization Dynamic structuralism and path-dependence: industrial economics in Italy. Revue d' Economie Industrielle 73 65-90
  • [2] Antonelli C.(1997)Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events International Journal of Industrial Organization 15 643-675
  • [3] Arthur B. W.(1989)L' economia, la politica e il segno della storia Economic Journal 99 116-131
  • [4] Boettke P. J.(1996)The postmodern moments of F. A. Hayek 's economics Nuova Economia e Storia 3 189-214
  • [5] Boettke P. J.(1997)Progress in behavioural game theory Where did economics go wrong?Modern economics as a.fight from reality. Critical Review 11 11-64
  • [6] Burczak T. A.(1994)Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation Economics and Philosophy 10 31-58
  • [7] Camerer F.(1997)Towards a non-Darwinian theory of institutional change Journal of Economic Perspectives 1 167-188
  • [8] Colin M. D.(1990)Strategic manoeuvering and mass-market dynamics: the triumph of VHS over Beta Administrative Science Quarterly 35 128-152
  • [9] Cohen A. L.(2003)Clio and the economics of QWERTY Journal of Bioeco-nomics 5 1-25
  • [10] Daniel E.(1992)Opportunities incentives and the collective patterns of technical change Business History Review 66 51-94