Visualization of rock mass classification systems

被引:66
作者
Cai M. [1 ]
Kaiser P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Geomechanics Research Centre, MIRARCO, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON
关键词
Block volume; Joint; Jointed rock mass; Multi-dimension; Rock classification; Visualization;
D O I
10.1007/s10706-005-7464-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A rock mass classification system is intended to classify and characterize the rock masses, provide a basis for estimating deformation and strength properties, supply quantitative data for mine support estimation, and present a platform for communication between exploration, design and construction groups. In most widely used rock mass classification systems, such as RMR and Q systems, up to six parameters are employed to classify the rock mass. Visualization of rock mass classification systems in multi-dimensional spaces is explored to assist engineers in identifying major controlling parameters in these rock mass classification systems. Different visualization methods are used to visualize the most widely used rock mass classification systems. The study reveals that all major rock mass classification systems tackle essentially two dominant factors in their scheme, i.e., block size and joint surface condition. Other sub-parameters, such as joint set number, joint space, joint surface roughness, alteration, etc., control these two dominant factors. A series two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and multi-dimensional visualizations are created for RMR, Q, Rock Mass index RMi and Geological Strength Index (GSI) systems using different techniques. In this manner, valuable insight into these rock mass classification systems is gained. © Springer 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:1089 / 1102
页数:13
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Barton N.R., Lien R., Lunde J., Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support, Rock Mech, 6, 4, pp. 189-239, (1974)
[2]  
Bieniawski Z.T., Engineering classification of jointed rock masses, Trans. S. Afr. Inst. Civ. Eng., 15, pp. 335-344, (1973)
[3]  
Bieniawski Z.T., Rock mass classification in rock engineering, Proceedings of the Symposium on Exploration for Rock Engineering, 1, pp. 97-106, (1976)
[4]  
Bieniawski Z.T., Engineering Rock Mass Classifications, (1989)
[5]  
Cai M., Kaiser P.K., Uno H., Tasaka Y., Minami M., Estimation of rock mass strength and deformation modulus of jointed hard rock masses using the GSI system, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 41, 1, pp. 3-19, (2004)
[6]  
Feiner S., Beshers C., Worlds within worlds: Metaphors for exploring n-dimensional virtual worlds, Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (UIST'90), pp. 76-83, (1990)
[7]  
Hashash Y., Wotring D., Yao J., Lee J., Fu Q., Visual framework for development and use of constitutive models, Int. J. Numer. Anal. Meth. Geomech., 26, pp. 1493-1513, (2002)
[8]  
Hoek E., Brown E.T., Empirical strength criterion for rock masses, J. Geotech. Eng. Div, ASCE, 106, GT9, pp. 1013-1035, (1980)
[9]  
Hoek E., Brown E.T., The Hoek-Brown failure criterion - A 1988 update, in Rock engineering for underground excavations, Proceedings of the 15th Canadian Rock Mechanical Symposium, pp. 31-38, (1988)
[10]  
Hoek E., Brown E.T., Practical estimates of rock mass strength, Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci., 34, 8, pp. 1165-1186, (1997)