Site response of the Ganges basin inferred from re-evaluated macroseismic observations from the 1897 Shillong, 1905 Kangra, and 1934 Nepal earthquakes

被引:2
作者
Susan E. Hough
Bilham Roger
机构
[1] U.S. Geological Survey,CIRES and Geological Sciences
[2] University of Colorado,undefined
来源
Journal of Earth System Science | 2008年 / 117卷
关键词
Historical earthquakes; site response; seismic hazard;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We analyze previously published geodetic data and intensity values for the Ms = 8.1 Shillong (1897), Ms = 7.8 Kangra (1905), and Ms = 8.2 Nepal/Bihar (1934) earthquakes to investigate the rupture zones of these earthquakes as well as the amplification of ground motions throughout the Punjab, Ganges and Brahmaputra valleys. For each earthquake we subtract the observed MSK intensities from a synthetic intensity derived from an inferred planar rupture model of the earthquake, combined with an attenuation function derived from instrumentally recorded earthquakes. The resulting residuals are contoured to identify regions of anomalous intensity caused primarily by local site effects. Observations indicative of liquefaction are treated separately from other indications of shaking severity lest they inflate inferred residual shaking estimates. Despite this precaution we find that intensites are 1–3 units higher near the major rivers, as well as at the edges of the Ganges basin. We find evidence for a post-critical Moho reflection from the 1897 and 1905 earthquakes that raises intensities 1–2 units at distances of the order of 150 km from the rupture zone, and we find that the 1905 earthquake triggered a substantial subsequent earthquake at Dehra Dun, at a distance of approximately 150 km. Four or more M = 8 earthquakes are apparently overdue in the region based on seismic moment summation in the past 500 years. Results from the current study permit anticipated intensities in these future earthquakes to be refined to incorporate site effects derived from dense macroseismic data.
引用
收藏
页码:773 / 782
页数:9
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Ambraseys N.(2000)Reappraisal of north-Indian earthquakes at the turn of the 20th Century Curr. Sci. 79 1237-1250
[2]  
Ambraseys N.(2000)A note on the Kangra Curr. Sci. 79 101-106
[3]  
Bilham R.(2003) = 7.8 earthquake of 4 April 1905 Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 93 655-673
[4]  
Ambraseys N.(2004)MSK isoseismal intensities evaluated for the 1897 Great Assam Earthquake Geophys. J. Int. 159 165-206
[5]  
Bilham R.(2003)Magnitude calibration of north Indian earthquakes Adv. Geophys. 46 46001-9
[6]  
Ambraseys N.(1997)Mountain Building, Erosion, and the Seismic Cycle in the Nepal Himalaya Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 89 608-625
[7]  
Douglas J.(2002)Generic finite-fault model for ground-motion prediction in eastern North America Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 695-710
[8]  
Avouac J P(1998)Source parameters of earthquakes in eastern and western North America based on finite-fault modeling Curr. Sci. 74 213-229
[9]  
Beresnev I. A.(2001)Geodetic constraints on the Translation and Deformation of India: implications for future great Himalayan earthquakes Geophys. J. Int. 144 1-23
[10]  
Atkinson G. M.(2001)Slow tilt reversal of the Lesser Himalaya between 1862 and 1992 at 78E and bounds to the southeast rupture of the 1905 Kangra earthquake Nature 410 806-809