Urine flow rates and residual urine volumes in urogynecology patients

被引:40
作者
Haylen B.T. [1 ,4 ]
Law M.G. [2 ]
Frazer M. [3 ]
Schulz S. [1 ]
机构
[1] St. Vincent's Clinic, Darlinghurst, NSW
[2] Natl. Ctr. HIV Epidemiol. Clin. Res., Darlinghurst, NSW
[3] Women's Health Directorate, Warrington Hospital NHS Trust, Warrington
[4] St. Vincent's Clinic, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010
关键词
Genital prolapse; Hysterectomy; Residual urine; Urinary incontinence; Urine flow; Urodynamics;
D O I
10.1007/s001920050064
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two hundred and fifty consecutive women referred because of symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction underwent a full clinical and urodynamic assessment. Their urine flow rates and residual urine volumes were analyzed. The urine flow rates of the urogynecology patients were found to be significantly less than those of an asymptomatic population. There were significant declines in urine flow rates in the presence of a previous hysterectomy and with increasing grades of prolapse, particularly uterine prolapse, cystocele and enterocele. Unlike the normal female population, there was also deterioration with increasing parity and age, the latter largely due to the increasing incidence of hysterectomy and prolapse with age. The 10th centile of the Liverpool Nomogram for the maximum urine flow rate was found to be the most useful discriminant for a final urodynamic diagnosis of voiding difficulties. Most urogynecology patients have no or small residual urine volumes, 74% < 10 ml and 81% < 30 ml (vs 95% < 30 ml in asymptomatic women). In urogynecology patients residuals were larger where there had been a prior hysterectomy or with grade 2 or higher uterine prolapse, cystocele and enterocele. Mean residual was 14.8 ml (vs 4.8 ml in asymptomatic women). These data indicate a higher incidence of voiding difficulties (abnormally slow urine flow (under 10th centile) and/or abnormally high residual urine volume (over 30 ml) in urogynecology patients, particularly those with higher grades of prolapse and with prior hysterectomy.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 383
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Peter W.P., Drake Jr. W.M., Uroflowmetric observations in gynecologic patients, JAMA, 166, pp. 721-724, (1958)
[2]  
Scott R., McIhlaney J.G., Voiding rate in normal adults, J Urol, 85, pp. 980-982, (1961)
[3]  
Backman K.-A., Urinary flow during micturition in normal women, Acta Chir Scand, 130, pp. 357-370, (1965)
[4]  
Susset J.G., Picker P., Kretz M., Jorest R., Critical evaluation of uroflowmeters and analysis of normal curves, J Urol, 109, pp. 874-878, (1973)
[5]  
Walters S., Olesen K.-P., Nordling J., Hald T., Bladder function in urologically normal middle-aged females, Scand J Urol Nephrol, 13, pp. 249-258, (1979)
[6]  
Drach G.W., Ignatoff J., Laytin T., Peak urinary flow rate: Observations in female subjects and comparison with male subjects, J Urol, 122, pp. 215-219, (1979)
[7]  
Bottacini M.R., Gleason D.J., Urodynamic norms in women: Normals versus stress incontinents, J Urol, 124, pp. 659-661, (1980)
[8]  
Fantl J.A., Smith P.J., Schneider V., Et al., Fluid weight uroflowmetry in women, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 145, pp. 1017-1024, (1982)
[9]  
Rollema H.J., Griffiths D.J., Jonas U., Computer-aided uroflowmetry. Normal values inhealthy women and applications in gynaecological patients, Proc Int Cont Soc, Lond, pp. 210-211, (1985)
[10]  
Haylen B.T., Ashby D., Sutherst J.R., Et al., Maximum and average urine flow rates in normal male and female populations - The Liverpool Nomograms, Br J Urol, 64, pp. 30-38, (1989)