Fitness for work after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: A retrospective study

被引:44
作者
Donceel P. [1 ]
Du Bois M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, School of Public Health, Dept. of Occup. and Ins. Medicine, B-3000 Leuven
关键词
Disc herniation; Fitness for work; Lumbar spine surgery;
D O I
10.1007/s005860050023
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This report retrospectively evaluates fitness for work in 3956 cases of surgery for lumbar disc herniation between 1992 and 1994. Patient records were derived from a database including all interventions of the insured population of the largest Belgian sickness fund. The datafile consisted of 126 cases of percutaneous nucleotomy (nucleotomy group), 286 cases of lumbar disc surgery with fusion (fusion group) and 3544 cases of standard lumbar disc surgery (standard group). Fitness to resume work within 12 months after intervention was obtained in about 70% of the patients in the standard and nucleotomy groups but in only 45% of the patients in the fusion group. Ten medicosocial factors were related to fitness for work as outcome measure. Incapacity for work more than 12 months after intervention was defined as a bad outcome. Logistic regression was used to test the combined relative significance of the different variables. For the standard group a long duration of work incapacity before intervention, older age, lower benefit, employment as a blue-collar worker, a long duration of hospital stay and unemployment were significantly associated with a poor outcome. Related factors for the fusion group were a long duration of work incapacity before operation, a long duration of hospital stay and unemployment. For the nucleotomy group, no factor was significantly associated with a poor outcome. For the total group, discectomy combined with fusion was significantly related to a poor outcome whereas a standard discectomy and a percutaneous nucleotomy did not differ in their impact on fitness for work.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 35
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Abramovitz J.N., Neff S.R., Lumbar disc surgery: Results of the prospective lumbar discectomy study of the joint section on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves of the American Association of Neurological Surgeons and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons, Neurosurgery, 29, pp. 301-308, (1991)
[2]  
Andrews D.W., Lavyne M.H., Retrospective analysis of microsurgical and standard lumbar discectomy, Spine, 15, pp. 329-335, (1990)
[3]  
Caspar W., Campbell B., Barbier D.D., Kretschmmer R., Gotfried Y., The Caspar microsurgical discectomy and comparison with conventional standard lumbar disc procedure, Neurosurgery, 28, pp. 78-87, (1991)
[4]  
Davis R.A., A long-term outcome analysis of 984 surgically treated herniated lumbar discs, J Neurosurg, 80, pp. 415-421, (1994)
[5]  
Deyo R.A., Loeser J.D., Bigos S.J., Herniated lumbar intervertebral disk, Ann Intern Med, 112, pp. 598-603, (1990)
[6]  
Frymoyer J.W., Magnitude of the problem, The Lumbar Spine, pp. 8-16, (1996)
[7]  
Hasenbring M., Marienfeld G., Kuhlendahl D., Soyka D., Risk factors of chronicity in lumbar disc patients, Spine, 19, pp. 2759-2765, (1994)
[8]  
Hurme M., Alaranta H., Factors predicting the result of surgery for lumbar intervertebral disc herniation, Spine, 9, pp. 933-938, (1986)
[9]  
Junge A., Frolich M., Ahrens S., Hasenbring M., Sandler A.J., Grob D., Dvorak J., Predictors of bad and good outcome of lumbar spine surgery, Spine, 21, pp. 1056-1065, (1996)
[10]  
Kotilainen E., Valtonen S., Carlson C.A., Microsurgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation: Follow-up of 237 patients, Acta Neurochir, 120, pp. 143-149, (1993)