Finasteride in the treatment of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia: A systematic review of randomised trials

被引:42
作者
Edwards J.E. [1 ]
Moore R.A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Pain Res./Nuffield Dept. of Anaesth., University of Oxford, Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals, Headington, Oxford
关键词
Prostate Specific Antigen; Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia; Symptom Score; Finasteride; Prostate Volume;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2490-2-14
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Benign prostatic hyperplasia affects older men. This systematic review determined efficacy and adverse effects of finasteride. Review methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Library, reference lists of reports, and reviews were searched for randomised, double-blind trials of finasteride in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Outcomes included symptom score, urinary flow rate, prostate volume, discontinuation, and adverse effects. Relative risk and NNT or NNH were calculated for dichotomous data. Sensitivity analyses assessed influences of baseline symptom severity, initial prostate volume, a dominating trial, and previous interventions. Results: Three trials had active controls and 19 had placebo. In placebo-controlled trials, 8820 patients received finasteride 5 mg and 5909 placebo over 3-48 months. Over 48 months finasteride produced greater improvements in total symptom score, maximum urinary flow rate, and prostate volume. Significantly more sexual dysfunction, impotence, ejaculation disorder and decreased libido occurred with finasteride at 12 months; the NNH for any sexual dysfunction at 12 months was 14. Significantly fewer men treated with finasteride experienced acute retention or had surgery at 24 or 48 months than with placebo; at 12 months the NNT was 49 (31 to 112) to avoid one acute urinary retention and 31 (21 to 61) to avoid one surgery. Sensitivity analyses showed benefit with finasteride 5 mg to be constant irrespective of the initial prostate volume. Conclusions: Information from many patients in studies of high quality showed beneficial effects of finasteride in terms of symptoms, flow rate and prostate volume. More utility would result if patient centred outcomes were reported in dichotomous form.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 17
页数:16
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Nordling J., Hald T., BPH versus LUTS: Reflections on lower urinary tract symptoms in search of a definition of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia, European Urology Update Series, 6, pp. 54-60, (1997)
[2]  
Simpson R.J., Benign prostatic hyperplasia. An overview of epidemiology and treatment, Primary Care in the New NHS, pp. 184-186, (2001)
[3]  
Lee A.J., Garraway W.M., Simpson R.J., The natural history of untreated lower urinary tract symptoms in middle-aged and elderly men over a period of five years, Eur Urol, 34, pp. 325-332, (1998)
[4]  
Macdonald R., Ishani A., Rutks I., A systematic review of Cernilton for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, BJU International, 85, pp. 836-841, (1999)
[5]  
Clifford G.M., Farmer R.D.T., Medical therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: A review of the literature, Eur Urol, 38, pp. 2-19, (2000)
[6]  
McNeill S.A., Hargreave T.B., Geffriaud-Ricouard C., Postvoid residual urine in patients with urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia: Pooled analysis of eleven controlled studies with alfuzosin, Urology, 57, pp. 459-465, (2001)
[7]  
Barry M.J., Roehrborn C.G., Benign prostatic hyperplasia, BMJ, 323, pp. 1042-1046, (2001)
[8]  
Nickel J.C., Placebo therapy of benign prostatic hyperplasia: A 25-month study, British Journal of Urology, 81, pp. 383-387, (1998)
[9]  
Boyle P., Robertson C., Manski R., Meta-analysis of randomised trials of terazosin in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, Urology, 58, pp. 717-722, (2001)
[10]  
Ramsey E.W., Dahlstrand C., Durability of results obtained with transurethral microwave thermotherapy in the treatment of men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia, Journal of Endourology, 14, pp. 671-675, (2000)