Organizational Memory as Objects, Processes, and Trajectories: An Examination of Organizational Memory in Use

被引:50
作者
Mark S. Ackerman
Christine Halverson
机构
[1] University of Michigan,School of Information and Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
[2] IBM Research,Social Computing Group
来源
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) | 2004年 / 13卷 / 2期
关键词
boundary objects; collective memory; contextualization; corporate memory; distributed cognition; information reuse; knowledge management; memory reuse; organizational memory; trajectories of information;
D O I
10.1023/B:COSU.0000045805.77534.2a
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
For proper knowledge management, organizations must consider how knowledge is kept and reused. The term organizational memory is due for an overhaul. Memory appears to be everywhere in organizations; yet, the term has been limited to only a few uses. Based on an ethnographic study of a telephone hotline group, this paper presents a micro-level, distributed cognition analysis of two hotline calls, the work activity surrounding the calls, and the memory used in the work activity. Drawing on the work of Star, Hutchins, and Strauss, the paper focuses on issues of applying past information for current use. Our work extends Strauss' and Hutchins' trajectories to get at the understanding of potential future use by participants and its role in current information storage. We also note the simultaneously shared provenance and governance of multiple memories – human and technical. This analysis and the theoretical framework we construct should be to be useful in further efforts in describing and analyzing organizational memory within the context of knowledge management efforts.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 189
页数:34
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Ackerman M. S.(1996)Definitional and Contextual Issues in Organizational and Group Memories Information Technology and People 9 10-24
[2]  
Ackerman M. S.(2000)Re-Examining Organizational Memory Communications of the ACM 43 58-63
[3]  
Halverson C.(1996)Social Activity Indicators for Groupware IEEE Computer 29 37-44.
[4]  
Ackerman M. S.(1993)Can Organisations Afford Knowledge? Computer Supported Cooperative Work 1 123-142
[5]  
Starr B.(1994)What 's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing Information Systems Research 5 400-421
[6]  
Anderson R.(2000)Distributed Cognition:Toward a New Theoretical Foundation for Human-Computer Interaction Research ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7 174-196
[7]  
Sharrock W.(1990)How a Cockpit Remembers Its Speeds A Theory of the E.ects of Advanced Information Technologies on Organizational Design,Intelligence,and Decision Making. Academy of Management Review 15 47-71
[8]  
Constant D.(1995)Grassroots: A System Providing a Uniform Framework for Communicating, Structuring, Sharing Information, and Organizing People Cognitive Science 19 265-288
[9]  
Kiesler S.(1996)Diary as Dialogue in Papermill Process Control Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 28 1157-1174
[10]  
Sproull L.(2000)Error as Opportunity:Learning in a Cooperative Task Communications of the ACM 43 65+.-40