Food purchases: Impacts from the consumers' point of view investigated with a modular LCA

被引:1
作者
Jungbluth N. [1 ]
Tietje O. [1 ]
Scholz R.W. [1 ]
机构
[1] CH-8610 Uster
关键词
Consumers point of view; Consumption patterns; Decision-making; levels; Eco-indicator; 95; Food; consumption; Functional unit; food; LCA; modular; simplified; Marginal change; Meat; Modular; Purchase; Vegetable;
D O I
10.1007/BF02978609
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The goal of this research work was to assist consumers in considering environmental aspects of food consumption. A simplified, modular LCA approach has been used to evaluate the impacts from the consumers' point of view. Comparative LCA's have been calculated for five single aspects of decisions: Type of agricultural practice, origin, packaging material, type of preservation, and consumption. The inventory for one module includes the environmental impacts related to one particular product characteristic. The modular LCA allows one to investigate the trade-offs among different decision parameters. It could be shown that most of the decision parameters might have an influence on the overall impact of a vegetable product. Greenhouse production and vegetables transported by air cause the highest surplus environmental impact. For meat products, the agricultural production determines the overall environmental impact. The total impact for vegetable or meat purchases may vary by a factor of eight or two-and-a-half. Different suggestions for consumers have been ranked according to the variation of average impacts, due to a marginal change of behaviour. Avoiding air- transported food products leads to the highest decrease of environmental impacts.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 142
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Aeberhard T., Nachhaltiger Konsum von Fleisch und Anderen Tierischen Produkten, (1996)
[2]  
Andersson K., Ohlsson T., Life Cycle Assessment of Bread Produced on Different Scales, In Int. J. LCA, 4, 1, pp. 25-40, (1999)
[3]  
Andersson K., Ohlsson T., Olsson P., Screening life cycle assessment (LCA) of tomato ketchup: A case study, Journal of Cleaner Production, 6, 3-4, pp. 277-288, (1998)
[4]  
Arnold S., Tanner C., Wolfing-Kast S., Die Wirkung Ausgewählter Kontextbedingungen auf das Ökologisch Nachhaltige Einkaufsverhalten: Resultate Einer Tagebuchstudie, (1999)
[5]  
Audsley E., Alber S., Cowell S.J., Clift R., Crettaz P., Gaillard G., Hausheer J., Jolliet O., Kleijn R., Mortensen B., Pearce D., Roger E., Teulon H., Weidema B., Ziejts H.V., Harmonisation of Environmental LCA for Agriculture. Final Report, (1997)
[6]  
Baltisberger F., Honegger U., Meyer A., Rahmen K., Todt W., Deckungsbeiträge - Ausgabe 19971. Disketten (2) for DOS - Excel, Landwirtschaftliche Beratungszentrale Lindau (LBL), (1997)
[7]  
Bernhard S., Moos T., Ökobilanz des Camembert: Entscheidungsgrundlagen für den Umweltbewussten Einkauf von Weichkäse, (1998)
[8]  
Boge S., Erfassung und Bewertung von Transportvorgängen: Die produktbezogene Transportkettenanalyse, Güterverkehr, Logistik und Umwelt, Analysen und Konzepte zum Interregionalen und Städtischen Verkehr, 2, pp. 113-141, (1995)
[9]  
Brand G., Scheidegger A., Schwank O., Braunschweig A., Bewertung in Ökobilanzen mit der Methode der ökologischen Knappheit - Ökofaktoren 1997, INFRAS, Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL), (1998)
[10]  
Braunschweig A., Brunner S., Hofstetter R., Muller-Wenk R., Umweltliche Bewertung im Automobilbau - Einführung und Weiterentwicklung des Eco-Indicator 95, (1997)