Discrete choice experiments in health economics: For better or for worse?

被引:64
作者
Bryan S. [1 ,5 ]
Dolan P. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Health Services Management Centre, School of Public Policy, University of Birmingham
[2] Sch. of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield
[3] Department of Economics, University of Sheffield
[4] Department of Economics, University of Oslo
[5] Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2RT
来源
The European Journal of Health Economics, formerly: HEPAC | 2004年 / 5卷 / 3期
关键词
Discrete choice experiments; Health economics;
D O I
10.1007/s10198-004-0241-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
One method that is increasingly being used in health economics to elicit stated preferences concerning health matters is the discrete choice experiment (DCE). This editorial explores four sets of issues facing researchers who wish to employ DCE techniques: (a) normative issues about how data from DCE studies might be used to inform policy, (b) psychological issues conv cerning the meaningfulness of the data generated, (d) technical issues relating to how the data are generated and (d) issues relating to the generalisability of the data from DCE studies. Given current uncertainties surrounding these issues, it is our view that more caution and greater circumspection towards DCE is appropriate at this stage.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 202
页数:3
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Kroes E.P., Sheldon R., Stated preference methods:an introduction, J Transport Econ Policy, 22, pp. 11-26, (1988)
[2]  
Hensher D.A., Barnard P.O., Truong T.P., The role of stated preference methods in studies of travel choice, J Transport Econ Policy, 22, pp. 45-58, (1988)
[3]  
Magat W.A., Viscusi W.K., Huber J., Paired comparison and contingent valuation approaches to morbidity risk valuation, J Environ Econ Manage, 15, pp. 395-411, (1988)
[4]  
Hensher D.A., Stated preference analysis of travel choices: The state of practice, Transportation, 21, pp. 107-133, (1994)
[5]  
Ryan M., Hughes J., Using conjoint analysis to assess women's preferences for miscarriage management, Health Econ, 6, pp. 261-273, (1997)
[6]  
Bryan S., Buxton M., Sheldon R., Grant A., Magnetic resonance imaging for the investigation of knee injuries: An investigation of preferences, Health Econ, 7, pp. 595-603, (1998)
[7]  
Vick S., Scott A., Agency in health care: Examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship, J Health Econ, 17, pp. 587-605, (1998)
[8]  
Ratcliffe J., Buxton M., Patients' preferences regarding the process and outcomes of life-saving technology. An application of conjoint analysis to liver transplantation, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 15, pp. 340-351, (1999)
[9]  
Ubach C., Scott A., French F., Awramenko M., Needham G., What do hospital consultants value about their jobs? A discrete choice experiment, BMJ, 326, (2003)
[10]  
Sculpher M.J., Bryan S., Fry P., De Winter P., Payne H., Emberton M., Patients' preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: A discrete choice experiment, BMJ, 328, pp. 382-385, (2004)