Management regimes affect woody plant productivity and water use efficiency in an urban desert ecosystem

被引:13
作者
Stabler L.B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biology, University of Central Oklahoma, Box 89, Edmond
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CO[!sub]2[!/sub] assimilation; Irrigation; Land use; Pruning; Trapezoidal integration model;
D O I
10.1007/s11252-008-0050-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Woody plant productivity and water use were evaluated under various management regimes in the Central Arizona Phoenix Long Term Ecological Research study area during 1999-2003. Management was defined as alteration of plant density, irrigation of plants, and removal of plant biomass via pruning. In a ground survey of 204 randomly chosen sites woody plant canopy area (CA) was higher in developed plots than in desert plots. Highest CA was measured in single family residential (SFR) sites but did not differ from most other developed site types. In experimental plots modeled after local SFR sites whole plot above ground biomass production (PP) and leaf area (LA) were higher and water use efficiency (WUE) was lower under high irrigation rate relative to low irrigation rate. Shrub pruning affected whole plot LA but not PP or WUE. Plant gas exchange data were used in conjunction with a trapezoidal integration model to predict maximum plant carbon uptake for plants in desert sites or under various irrigation regimes. These data might be used to facilitate long term monitoring of plant productivity and water use in the study area and to establish sound management practices in urban and suburban environments. © 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC.
引用
收藏
页码:197 / 211
页数:14
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Barbour M.G., Burk J.H., Pitts W.D., Gilliam F.S., Schwartz M.W., Terrestrial Plant Ecology, (1999)
[2]  
Buyantuyev A., Wu J., Gries C., Estimating vegetation cover in an urban environment based on Landsat ETM + imagery: A case study in Phoenix, USA, Int J Remote Sens, 28, pp. 269-291, (2007)
[3]  
Bell D.S., Whitesell C.D., Schubert T.H., Mixed plantations of Eucalyptus and leguminous trees enhance biomass production, USDA Forest Service Research Paper PSW-175, (1985)
[4]  
Bolund P., Hunhammar S., Ecosystem services in urban areas, Ecol Econ, 29, pp. 293-301, (1999)
[5]  
Devitt D.A., Morris R.L., Neuman D.S., Evapotranspiration and growth response of three woody ornamental species placed under varying irrigation regimes, J Am Soc Hortic Sci, 199, pp. 452-457, (1994)
[6]  
Eamus D., The interaction of rising CO2 and temperature with water use efficiency, Plant Cell Environ, 14, pp. 843-852, (1991)
[7]  
Hadley N.F., Szarek S.R., Productivity of desert ecosystems, Bioscience, 31, pp. 747-753, (1981)
[8]  
Ho R.H., Schooley H.O., A review of tree crown management in conifer orchards, For Chron, 71, pp. 310-316, (1995)
[9]  
Hope D., Gries C., Casagrande D., Redman C.L., Grimm N., Martin C.A., Drivers of spatial variation in plant diversity across the Central Arizona-Phoenix ecosystem, Soc Nat Resour, 19, pp. 101-116, (2006)
[10]  
Hornbeck R.W., Numerical Methods, (1975)