Algorithms for Hierarchical Spatial Reasoning

被引:15
作者
Papadias D. [1 ,7 ,8 ,9 ,10 ,11 ,12 ,13 ]
Egenhofer M.J. [2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Department of Computer Science, Hong Kong Univ. of Sci. and Technol., Clearwater Bay
[2] Natl. Ctr. Geogr. Info. and Anal., Department of Computer Science, University of Maine, Orono
[3] Natl. Ctr. Geogr. Info. and Anal., University of Maine
[4] Computer Science Dept., Hong Kong Univ. of Sci. and Technol.
[5] Elec. and Computer Engineering Dept., Natl. Technical University of Athens
[6] Department of Geoinformation, Technical University of Vienna
[7] Dept. of Comp. Sci. and Engineering, University of California, San Diego, CA
[8] Natl. Ctr. Geogr. Info. and Anal., University of Maine
[9] Artif. Intell. Research Division, Ger. Natl. Res. Ctr. Info. Technol.
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Direction relations; Geographic databases; Path consistency; Spatial reasoning;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009760430440
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In several applications, there is the need to reason about spatial relations using multiple local frames of reference that are hierarchically organized. This paper focuses on hierarchical reasoning about direction relations, a special class of spatial relations that describe order in space (e.g., north or northeast). We assume a spatial database of points and regions. Points belong to regions, which may recursively be parts of larger regions. The direction relations between points in the same region are explicitly represented (and not calculated from coordinates). Inference mechanisms are applied to extract direction relations between points located in different regions and to detect inconsistencies. We study two complementary types of inference. The first one derives the direction relation between points from the relations of their ancestor regions. The second type derives the relation through chains of common points using path consistency. We present algorithms for both types of inference and discuss their computational complexity.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 273
页数:22
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Allen J.F., Maintaining Knowledge about Temporal Intervals, CACM, 26, 11, pp. 832-843, (1983)
[2]  
Car A., Frank A., General Principles of Hierarchical Spatial Reasoning: The Case of Wayfinding, The Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, (1994)
[3]  
Chang S.K., Shi Q.Y., Yan C.W., Iconic Indexing by 2-D String, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAMI-9, 3, pp. 413-428, (1987)
[4]  
Clementini E., Sharma J., Egenhofer M., Modeling Topological Spatial Relations: Strategies for Query Processing, International Journal of Computer and Graphics, 18, 6, pp. 815-822, (1994)
[5]  
Cui Z., Cohn A.G., Randell D.A., Qualitative and Topological Relationships in Spatial Databases, Symposium on Large Spatial Databases (SSD), (1993)
[6]  
Davis E., Representing and Acquiring Geographic Knowledge, (1986)
[7]  
De Kleer J., Brown J., Qualitative Physics based on Confluences, Artificial Intelligence, 24, pp. 7-83, (1984)
[8]  
Dutta S., Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: A Semi-Qualitative Approach using Fuzzy Logic, Proceedings of the First Symposium on the Design and Implementation of Large Spatial Databases, (1989)
[9]  
Egenhofer M., Franzosa R., Point Set Topological Relations, International Journal of Geographic Information Systems, 5, pp. 161-174, (1991)
[10]  
Egenhofer M., Sharma J., Assessing the Consistency of Complete and Incomplete Topological Information, Geographical Systems, 1, 1, pp. 47-68, (1993)