Continuing Assessment of Teacher Reactions to a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System

被引:2
作者
Herbert G. Heneman
Anthony T. Milanowski
机构
[1] University of Wisconsin-Madison,Consortium for Policy Research in Education and Graduate School of Business
[2] University of Wisconsin-Madison,Consortium for Policy Research in Education
来源
Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education | 2003年 / 17卷 / 2期
关键词
Pilot Study; Evaluation System; Field Test; Public School; Teacher Evaluation;
D O I
10.1023/B:PEEV.0000032427.99952.02
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Building on our evaluation of a field test (Milanowski & Heneman, 2001), the present study provides a description and evaluation of the first two years of district-wide implementation of a standards-based teacher evaluation system in the Cincinnati public schools. We describe the new system and changes that were made to it as a result of the pilot study. We then focus on two substantive research issues—the inter-rater agreement of classroom observations and teacher reactions to the new system. We found that carefully selected and trained peer evaluators provided ratings that showed moderate to high agreement with ratings by administrators. Teachers' specific reactions to the new system on several dimensions were found to be mostly neutral. Teachers' overall reactions to the new system, however, were less favorable. Based on these results and other research we make several suggestions for how to effectively design and implement a standards-based teacher evaluation system.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 195
页数:22
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Davis D.R.(2000)Issues in Implementing a New Teacher Assessment System in a Large Urban School District: Results of a Qualitative Field Study Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 14 285-306
  • [2] Pool J.E.(2000)Exploring the Concept of Acceptability as a Criterion for Evaluating Performance Measures Group and Organization Management 25 22-4
  • [3] Mits-Cash M.(2000)Performance Appraisal Reactions: Measurements, Modeling, and Method Bias Journal of Applied Psychology 85 708-723
  • [4] Hedge S.W.(2002)Teacher Motivation and School-Based Performance Awards Educational Administration Quarterly 38 372-401
  • [5] Teachout M.S.(2003)Quest for Quality: Recruitment, Retention, Professional Development, and Performance Evaluation in Baltimore City's Public Schools Journal of Education for Student Placed at Risk 8 87-116
  • [6] Keeping L.M.(1987)The Accuracy of Principals' Judgments of Teacher Performance Journal of Educational Research 80 242-247
  • [7] Levy P.E.(2001)Assessment of Teacher Reactions to a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System: A Pilot Study Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education 15 193-212
  • [8] Kelly C.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [9] Heneman H.G.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [10] Milanowski A.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined