Polyhexamethylbiguanid (PHMB) as preoperative antiseptic for cateract surgery

被引:40
作者
Hansmann F. [1 ]
Kramer A. [2 ]
Ohgke H. [3 ]
Strobel H. [4 ]
Müller M. [1 ]
Geerling G. [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Univ. Klin. S.-Holstein Lubeck, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck
[2] Inst. fur Hygiene und Umweltmedizin, Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Univ. Greifswald
[3] Inst. fur Mikrobiologie und Hygiene, Universität Lübeck
[4] Apotheke Univ. Klin. S.-H. Lubeck, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck
[5] Klinik für Augenheilkunde, Univ. Klin. Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, 3538 Lübeck
来源
Der Ophthalmologe | 2004年 / 101卷 / 4期
关键词
Antiseptic; Cataract surgery; Conjunctival smear; PHMB; PVP-iodine;
D O I
10.1007/s00347-003-0933-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. We examined the efficacy and tolerability of Lavasept® (polyhexamethylenbiguanid or PHMB) - an iodine-free antiseptic - in comparison to polyvinylpyrolidon iodine and Ringer's solution, as an alternative preoperative antiseptic. Patients and methods. In a randomized controlled double-blind trial 3 drops of Lavasept°, 1.25%, PVP-iodine or Ringer's solution were applied preoperatively in 29 patients. The number of colony forming units (cfu) grown from conjunctival smears and conjunctival hyperaemia, corneal epitheliopathy and ocular surface pain were assessed preoperatively, intraoperatively and 1 day postoperatively. Results. Despite intraoperative application of PVP-iodine, 40% of patients receiving Ringers solution still presented with more than 5 colony forming units (cfu) at the end of the procedure, while all patients that had additional preoperative Lavasept° or PVP-iodine achieved relative sterility with less than 5 cfu (p<0.05). While the effect of Lavasept lasted until the next day, conjunctival microbial colonisation recurred in eyes treated with PVP-iodine. As expected conjunctival hyperaemla and corneal epitheliopathy increased significantly postoperatively but no differences were observed between the 3 solutions tested. Conclusion. The preoperative application of Lavasept° reduces the conjunctival flora safely and effectively. The microbicidal efficacy is equal to PVP-iodine, but potentially longer lasting. No signs of local or systemic intolerability were observed. Lavasept° may be used as a potential alternative preoperative antiseptic and is suitable for iodine-intolerant patients.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 383
页数:6
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Azuara-Blanco A., Sadiq A.S., Hussain M., Et al., Successful medical treatment of Acanthamoeba keratitis, Int Ophthalmol, 21, pp. 223-227, (1997)
[2]  
Aaberg Jr. T.M., Nosocomial acute-onset postoperative endophthalmitis survery
[3]  
a 10-year review of incidence and outcomes, Ophthalmology, 105, pp. 1004-1010, (1998)
[4]  
Beckmann M., Reuscher A., Wenzel M., Umfrage von DGII und BVA 2001 zum derzeitigen Stand der Katarakt-und refraktiven Chirurgie, 16, Kongress der Deutschsprachigen Gesellschaft für Intraokukarlinsen-Implantation und Refraktive Chirurgie, 16, pp. 21-29, (2002)
[5]  
Bialasiewicz A., Patienteneigene bindehautflora spielt eine wichtige rolle bei der entstehung von endophthalmitiden, Ophthalmologische Nachrichten, 4, pp. 8-9, (1993)
[6]  
Ciulla T.A., Start M.B., Maket S., Bacterial endophthalmitis prophylaxis for cataract surgery: An evidenced-based update, Ophthalmology, 109, pp. 13-24, (2002)
[7]  
Dora C., Erfahrungsbericht zur prophylaxe und therapie von Weichteil- und knocheninfektionen mit dem antiinfektikum lavasept, Prophylaxe und Therapie ron Infektionen in der Orthopädie, pp. 18-21, (1997)
[8]  
Portal Rund um die Schilddrüse, (2001)
[9]  
Fahmy J.A., Bacterial flora in relation to cataract extraction. V. Effect of topical antibiotics on the preoperative conjunctival flora, Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh), 58, pp. 567-575, (1980)
[10]  
Geerling G., Baatz J., Harder D., Et al., Local tolerance, Antiseptic Prophylaxis and Therapy in Ocular Infections, pp. 32-56, (2002)