Behavior of osteoblastic cells cultured on titanium and structured zirconia surfaces

被引:88
作者
Depprich R. [1 ]
Ommerborn M. [2 ]
Zipprich H. [3 ]
Naujoks C. [1 ]
Handschel J. [1 ]
Wiesmann H.-P. [4 ]
Kübler N.R. [1 ]
Meyer U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
[2] Department of Operative and Preventive Dentistry and Endodontics, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf
[3] Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Section of Materials Sciences, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University, Frankfurt
[4] Department of Cranio- and Maxillofacial Surgery, Westphalian Wilhelms-University, Münster
关键词
Dental Implant; Titanium Surface; Osteosarcoma Cell Line; Primary Osteoblast; Zirconia Ceramic;
D O I
10.1186/1746-160X-4-29
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. Osseointegration is crucial for the long-term success of dental implants and depends on the tissue reaction at the tissue-implant interface. Mechanical properties and biocompatibility make zirconia a suitable material for dental implants, although surface processings are still problematic. The aim of the present study was to compare osteoblast behavior on structured zirconia and titanium surfaces under standardized conditions. Methods. The surface characteristics were determined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). In primary bovine osteoblasts attachment kinetics, proliferation rate and synthesis of bone-associated proteins were tested on different surfaces. Results. The results demonstrated that the proliferation rate of cells was significantly higher on zirconia surfaces than on titanium surfaces (p < 0.05; Student's t-test). In contrast, attachment and adhesion strength of the primary cells was significant higher on titanium surfaces (p < 0.05; U test). No significant differences were found in the synthesis of bone-specific proteins. Ultrastructural analysis revealed phenotypic features of osteoblast-like cells on both zirconia and titanium surfaces. Conclusion. The study demonstrates distinct effects of the surface composition on osteoblasts in culture. Zirconia improves cell proliferation significantly during the first days of culture, but it does not improve attachment and adhesion strength. Both materials do not differ with respect to protein synthesis or ultrastructural appearance of osteoblasts. Zirconium oxide may therefore be a suitable material for dental implants. © 2008 Depprich et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]
Puleo D.A., Thomas M.V., Implant surfaces, Dent Clin North Am, 50, pp. 323-38, (2006)
[2]
Meyer U., Buchter A., Wiesmann H.P., Joos U., Jones D.B., Basic reactions of osteoblasts on structured material surfaces, Eur Cell Mater, 9, pp. 39-49, (2005)
[3]
Anselme K., Linez P., Bigerelle M., Le Maguer D., Le Maguer A., Hardouin P., Hildebrand H.F., Iost A., Leroy J.M., The relative influence of the topography and chemistry of TiAl6V4 surfaces on osteoblastic cell behaviour, Biomaterials, 21, pp. 1567-77, (2000)
[4]
Deligianni D.D., Katsala N., Ladas S., Sotiropoulou D., Amedee J., Missirlis Y.F., Effect of surface roughness of the titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V on human bone marrow cell response and on protein adsorption, Biomaterials, 22, pp. 1241-51, (2001)
[5]
Piconi C., MacCauro G., Muratori F., Brach Del Prever E., Alumina and zirconia ceramics in joint replacements, Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Biomechanics, 1, pp. 19-32, (2003)
[6]
Christel P., Meunier A., Dorlot J.M., Crolet J.M., Witvoet J., Sedel L., Boutin P., Biomechanical compatibility and design of ceramic implants for orthopedic surgery, Ann N Y Acad Sci, 523, pp. 234-56, (1988)
[7]
Meyenberg K.H., Luthy H., Scharer P., Zirconia posts: A new all-ceramic concept for nonvital abutment teeth, J Esthet Dent, 7, pp. 73-80, (1995)
[8]
Kakehashi Y., Luthy H., Naef R., Wohlwend A., Scharer P., A new all-ceramic post and core system: Clinical, technical, and in vitro results, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 18, pp. 586-93, (1998)
[9]
Tinschert J., Natt G., Mohrbotter N., Spiekermann H., Schulze K.A., Lifetime of alumina- and zirconia ceramics used for crown and bridge restorations, J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, 80, pp. 317-21, (2007)
[10]
Yildirim M., Edelhoff D., Hanisch O., Spiekermann H., Ceramic abutments - a new era in achieving optimal esthetics in implant dentistry, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 20, pp. 81-91, (2000)