Teacher ratings of student engagement with educational software: An exploratory study

被引:23
作者
Robert L. Bangert-Drowns
Curtis Pyke
机构
[1] University at Albany,The George Washington University
[2] State University of New York,undefined
[3] Graduate School of Education and Human Development,undefined
关键词
Teacher Rating; Student Engagement; Classroom Teacher; Reading Score; Educational Software;
D O I
10.1007/BF02504992
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The quality of students' learning engagement may significantly influence their learning. Can teachers accurately judge student learning engagement with educational software? In this exploratory study, 3 fifth-grade teachers used a seven-level taxonomy to rate the frequency of different forms of engagement among 42 students interacting with different types of educational software. Teachers spontaneously treated the seven levels of engagement as a continuum, rating students highest on one level or a set of contiguous levels. Teachers generally agreed when ranking students by their typical levels of engagement, but disagreed regarding the actual frequencies of different engagement types. Ratings of software engagement conceived of as interpretive activity were correlated significantly with student reading test scores. Given the authentic classroom conditions in which this study took place, the results are promising for the classroom utility of the seven-level conception of student engagement with software.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 37
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Ainley M.D.(1993)Styles of engagement with learning: Multidimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement Journal of Educational Psychology 85 395-405
[2]  
Bangert-Drowns R.L.(2001)A taxonomy of student engagement with educational software: An exploration of literate thinking with electronic text Journal of Educational Computing Research 24 213-234
[3]  
Pyke C.(1987)An attainable version of high literacy: Approaches to teaching higher-order skills in reading and writing Curriculum Inquiry 17 9-30
[4]  
Bereiter C.(1995)Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis Review of Educational Research 65 245-281
[5]  
Scardamalia M.(1983)The role of cognitive engagement in classroom learning and motivation Educational Psychologist 18 88-109
[6]  
Butler D.(1996)Educational contexts for engagement in literacy The Reading Teacher 49 432-445
[7]  
Winne P.(1987)Interactional effects of instructional quality and teacher judgment accuracy on achievement Teaching and Teacher Education 3 91-98
[8]  
Corno L.(1989)Teacher-based judgments of academic achievement: A review of literature Review of Educational Research 59 297-313
[9]  
Mandinach E.B.(1995)Engagement as a design concept for multimedia Canadian Journal of Educational Communication 24 49-59
[10]  
Guthrie J.T.(1995)Hypertext learning environments, cognitive flexibility, and the transfer of complex knowledge: An empirical investigation Journal of Educational Computing Research 12 301-333