The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalities

被引:91
作者
Chander P. [1 ]
Tulkens H. [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Statistical Institute, California Institute of Technology, New Delhi 110016
[2] CORE, Univ. Catholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve
关键词
Characteristic Function; Economic Theory; Game Theory; Optimal Outcome; Environmental Externality;
D O I
10.1007/BF01263279
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
When environmental externalities are international - i.e. transfrontier - they most often are multilateral and embody public good characteristics. Improving upon inefficient laissez-faire equilibria requires voluntary cooperation for which the game-theoretic core concept provides optimal outcomes that have interesting properties against free riding. To define the core, however, the characteristic function of the game associated with the economy (which specifies the payoff achievable by each possible coalition of players - here, the countries) must also reflect in each case the behavior of the players which are not members of the coalition. This has been for a long time a disputed issue in the theory of the core of economies with externalities. Among the several assumptions that can be made as to this behaviour, a plausible one is defined in this paper, for which it is shown that the core of the game is nonempty. The proof is constructive in the sense that it exhibits a strategy (specifying an explicit coordinated abatement policy and including financial transfers) that has the desired property of nondomination by any proper coalition of countries, given the assumed behavior of the other countries. This strategy is also shown to have an equilibrium interpretation in the economic model.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 401
页数:22
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Barrett S., The problem of global environmental protection, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 6, 1, pp. 68-79, (1990)
[2]  
Bernheim B.D., Peleg B., Whinston M.D., Coalition proof Nash equilibria 1 concepts, Journal of Economic Theory, 42, pp. 1-12, (1987)
[3]  
Carraro C., Siniscalco D., Strategies for the international protection of the environment, Journal of Public Economics, 52, pp. 309-328, (1993)
[4]  
Champsaur, How to share the cost of a public good, International Journal of Game Theory, 4, pp. 113-129, (1975)
[5]  
Chander P., Dynamic procedures and incentives in public good economies, Econometrica, 61, pp. 1341-1354, (1993)
[6]  
Chander P., Tulkens H., Strategically stable cost sharing in an economic-ecological negotiation process, International Environmental Problems, (1991)
[7]  
Chander P., Tulkens H., Theoretical foundations of negotiations and cost sharing in transfrontier pollution problems, European Economic Review, 36, 2-3, pp. 288-299, (1992)
[8]  
Chander P., Tulkens H., Aspects stratégiques des négociations internationales sur les pollutions transfrontières et du partage des coûts de l'épuration, Revue Economique, 43, 4, pp. 769-781, (1992)
[9]  
Chander P., Tulkens H., A core-theoretical solution for the design of cooperative agreements on transfrontier pollution, International Tax and Public Finance, 2, 2, pp. 279-294, (1995)
[10]  
Foley D., Lindahl solution and the core of an economy with public goods, Econometrica, 38, pp. 66-72, (1970)