Internet use and perceptions of information reliability by parents in a neonatal intensive care unit

被引:47
作者
Amrit S Dhillon
Susan G Albersheim
Sulaiman Alsaad
Nisha S Pargass
John A F Zupancic
机构
[1] Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
[2] Department of Neonatology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, The Neonatal Unit, Birmingham B15 2TG, Edgbaston
[3] Ministry of Health, Al Jahra Hospital, Al Jahra
[4] Department of Neonatology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
[5] Harvard Newborn Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.jp.7210945
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To assess Internet use and perceptions of information reliability by parents in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Study Design: A standardized questionnaire study. Results: A total of 100 parents were approached and 90% participated. In all, 79% owned a computer, 85.5% had Internet access, and 75.5% regularly spent > 1 to 2 hour/day on the computer. There was a significant reduction in the proportion of parents using the Internet after birth of their baby (before birth: nonmedical searches 84% and medical searches 47%; after birth: nonmedical searches 40% and medical searches 29%; p < 0.0001 and <0.03, respectively). Internet access was more likely in those with higher level of education (p = 0.006) and fluency in reading English (p = 0.05). In all, 80% considered the NICU doctors as a reliable source of medical information compared with 10% in the case of the Internet. Conclusions: Although a considerable proportion of parents use the Internet for medical information, many still view the information obtained as unreliable.
引用
收藏
页码:420 / 424
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Impicciatore P., Pandolfini C., Casella N., Bonati M., Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: A systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home, BMJ, 14, pp. 1875-1879
[2]  
Mandl K.D., Kohane I.S., Brandt A.M., Electronic patient-physician communication: Problems and promise, Ann. Intern. Med., 129, pp. 495-500, (1998)
[3]  
Mandl K.D., Feit S., Pena B.M.G., Kohane I.S., Growth and determinants of access in patient e-mail and internet use, Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med., 154, pp. 508-511, (2000)
[4]  
Glowniak J.V., Medical resources on the internet, Ann. Intern. Med., 123, pp. 123-131, (1995)
[5]  
Kassirer J.R., Journals in bits and bytes. Electronic medical journals, N. Engl. J. Med., 326, pp. 195-197, (1992)
[6]  
Ferguson T., Health Online. How to Find Health Information, Support Groups, and Self-help Communities in Cyberspace, (1996)
[7]  
Widman L.E., Tong D.A., Requests for medical advice from patients and families to health care providers who publish on the world wide web, Arch. Intern. Med., 157, pp. 209-212, (1997)
[8]  
Eysenbach G., Diepgen T.L., Responses to unsolicited patient e-mail requests for medical advice on the World Wide Web, JAMA, 280, pp. 1333-1335, (1998)
[9]  
Kunst H., Groot D., Latthe P.M., Latthe M., Khan K.S., Accuracy of information on apparently credible websites: Survey of five common health topics, BMJ, 324, pp. 581-582, (2002)
[10]  
The online health care revolution: How the web Americans take better care of themselves