Stream epilithic, epipelic and epiphytic diatoms: Habitat fidelity and use in biomonitoring

被引:78
作者
Winter J.G. [1 ,2 ]
Duthie H.C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Biology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont.
[2] Dorset Environmental Science Centre, Dorset, Ont., P0A 1E0
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Biomonitoring; Diatoms; Epilithon; Epipelon; Epiphyton; Periphyton;
D O I
10.1023/A:1011461727835
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We compared the use of epilithic, epiphytic, and epipelic diatom communities in stream biomonitoring by investigating species composition and relationships with measured water quality variables in two tributaries of the Grand River, Ontario, Canada. Although ordination showed some separation of the epilithon from other habitats, clear habitat preferences and seasonality were not identified. Canonical correspondence analysis showed that measured water quality variables explained the major gradients in the diatom data for all three habitats. The diatoms from each habitat were strongly related to alkalinity, suspended solids, biological oxygen demand and conductivity, and in addition, epipelic and epiphytic diatoms showed significant relationships with total phosphorus. It was concluded that although some species were more abundant in one habitat than the others, the community structure of the epilithic, epiphytic and epipelic habitats from these streams was not consistently different. The results indicate no apparent benefit to sampling discrete habitats for water quality monitoring using diatoms, however, the best relationship are obtained using the sum of the diatom data from all three habitats.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 353
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Standard methods for the examination of water, sewage and wastewater. 17th edition, (1989)
[2]  
Burkholder J., Interactions of benthic algae with their substrata, Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, pp. 253-297, (1996)
[3]  
Cox E.J., Studies on the algae of a small softwater stream III. Interaction between discharge, sediment composition and diatom flora, Arch Hydrobiol/Suppl 83, 4, pp. 567-584, (1991)
[4]  
Gomez N., Use of epipelic diatoms for evaluation of water quality in the Matanza- Riachuelo (Argentina), a pampean plain river, Wat Res, 32, pp. 2029-2034, (1998)
[5]  
Hartley B., Barber H.G., Carter J.R., An Atlas of British Diatoms, (1996)
[6]  
Kelly M.G., Cazaubon A., Coring E., Dell'Uomo A., Ector L., Goldsmith B., Guasch H., Hurlimann J., Jarlman A., Kawecka B., Kwandrans J., Laugaste R., Lindstrom E.-A., Leitao M., Marvan P., Padisak J., Pipp E., Prygiel J., Rott E., Sabater S., Van Dam H., Vizinet J., Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe, J Appl Phycol, 10, pp. 215-224, (1998)
[7]  
Krammer K., Lange-Bertalot H., Bacillariophyceae. Süsswasserflora von mitteleuropa, Band, 2, 1-4, (1986)
[8]  
Lowe R.L., Pan Y., Benthic algal communities as biological monitors, Algal Ecology: Freshwater Benthic Ecosystems, pp. 705-739, (1996)
[9]  
Parsons T.R., Maita Y., Lalli C.M., A Manual of Chemical and Biological Methods for Seawater Analysis, (1984)
[10]  
Patrick R., Reimer C., The Diatoms of the United States, 1, (1966)