A bedside prediction-scoring model for late-onset neonatal sepsis

被引:31
作者
Okascharoen C. [1 ,2 ]
Sirinavin S. [1 ,2 ]
Thakkinstian A. [2 ]
Kitayaporn D. [3 ]
Supapanachart S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Pediatrics, Mahidol University, Bangkok
[2] Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok 10400
[3] Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok
关键词
D O I
10.1038/sj.jp.7211404
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: Insufficient tools for bedside prediction of late-onset neonatal sepsis (LNS) initiated this study. The objective was to develop and validate a simple prediction-scoring model for LNS defined as culture-proven sepsis occurring 72 hours after birth. Methods: The study was performed at a university hospital in Bangkok. The derivation phase included medical records of 1870 neonates, randomly selected from 9347 records of neonates who had been hospitalized for >72 hours during 1998 to 2000, of which 1824 records were available. In all, 100 neonates were clinically suspected of sepsis and 17 had proven LNS. The validation phase included 73 neonates suspected of having sepsis during July 2002 to June 2003 and 25 who had LNS. Weighted coefficients from Cox's proportional hazards model and receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were used. Results: The incidence density of LNS was 17/11355 (1.5/1000) person-days. A scoring model was developed and consisted of the following: hypotension (score 4), abnormal body temperature (score 3), respiratory insufficiency (score 2), neutrophil band form fraction >1% (score 2), platelet count <150 × 103/μl (score 2), and umbilical venous catheterization (1 to 7 or >7 days; score 2 or 4). The area under the ROC curves for prediction of LNS in a neonate suspected of sepsis in each of the two phases was 0.85 and 0.80, respectively (p=0.436). The mean probabilities of LNS were approximately 0.10 (low risk) for scores from 0 to 3; 0.50 (intermediate risk) for scores from 4 to 6; and 0.70 (high risk) for scores ≥7. Conclusion: A simple prediction-scoring model for LNS was developed. Validation of the scores suggested good diagnostic performance. © 2005 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 783
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Dear P., Infection in the newborn, Textbook of Neonatology, pp. 1109-1201, (1999)
  • [2] Fanaroff A.A., Korones S.B., Wright L.L., Et al., Incidence, presenting features, risk factors and significance of late onset septicemia in very low birth weight infants, Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J., 17, pp. 593-598, (1998)
  • [3] Mahieu L.M., De Dooy J.J., Cossey V.R., Et al., Internal and external validation of the NOSEP prediction score for nosocomial sepsis in neonates, Crit. Care Med., 30, pp. 1459-1466, (2002)
  • [4] Mahieu L.M., De Muynck A.O., De Dooy J.J., Et al., Prediction of nosocomial sepsis in neonates by means of a computer-weighted bedside scoring system (NOSEP score), Crit. Care Med., 28, pp. 2026-2033, (2000)
  • [5] Singh S., Dutta S., Narang A., Predicitve Clinical Scores for Diagnosis of Late Onset Neonatal Septicemia, J. Trop. Pediatr., 49, pp. 235-239, (2003)
  • [6] Manroe B.L., Weinberg A.G., Rosenfeld C.R., Browne R., The neonatal blood count in health and disease. I. Reference values for neutrophilic cells, J. Pediatr., 95, pp. 89-98, (1979)
  • [7] Moons K.G., Harrell F.E., Steyerberg E.W., Should scoring rules be based on odds ratios or regression coefficients?, J. Clin. Epidemiol., 55, pp. 1054-1055, (2002)
  • [8] Auriti C., Maccallini A., Di Liso G., Et al., Risk factors for nosocomial infections in a neonatal intensive-care unit, J. Hosp. Infect., 53, pp. 25-30, (2003)
  • [9] Brodie S.B., Sands K.E., Gray J.E., Et al., Occurrence of nosocomial bloodstream infections in six neonatal intensive care units, Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J., 19, pp. 56-65, (2000)
  • [10] Stoll B.J., Gordon T., Korones S.B., Et al., Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: A report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, J. Pediatr., 129, pp. 63-71, (1996)