Minimum requirements for modelling bivalve carrying capacity

被引:66
作者
Smaal A.C. [1 ]
Prins T.C. [2 ]
Dankers N. [3 ]
Ball B. [4 ]
机构
[1] Netherlands Inst. for Fish. Research, RIVO-DLO, Centre for Shellfish Research, 4400 AB Yerseke
[2] Natl. Inst. Coast. and Mar. Mgmt., RIKZ, 4330 EA Middelburg
[3] Inst. for Nat. and Forest. Research, IBN-DLO, 1790 AD Den Burg
[4] Martin Ryan Mar. Science Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway
关键词
Bivalve suspension feeders; Carrying capacity; Ecosystem scale; Modelling; Shellfish cultivation;
D O I
10.1023/A:1009947627828
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The concept of carrying capacity of an ecosystem for natural populations is derived from the logistic growth curve in population ecology, and defined as the maximum standing stock that can be supported by a given ecosystem for a given time. This definition needs to be modified for the exploitation of ecosystems. Carrying capacity for exploitation is defined as the standing stock at which the annual production of a marketable cohort is maximized. For bivalve suspension feeders, the dominant factor determining the exploitation carrying capacity at the ecosystem scale is primary production. At a local scale carrying capacity depends on physical constraints such as substrate, shelter and food supply by tidal currents. We evaluate critically some existing models of exploited ecosystems for shellfish cultivation in order to formulate the minimum requirements of a generic carrying capacity model. Generic models can be developed for both the ecosystem scale and the local scale, depending on the aim of the modelling. Transport processes, sediment dynamics and submodels for organism and population level processes are minimum requirements for carrying capacity modelling.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 428
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Bacher C., Duarte P., Ferreira J.G., Heral M., Raillard O., Assessment and comparison of the Marennes-Oléron Bay (France) and Carlingford Lough (Ireland) carrying capacity with ecosystem models, Aquat Ecol, 31, pp. 379-394, (1998)
[2]  
Bayne B.L., Warwick R.M., Feeding and growth of bivalves: Observations and models, J Exp Mar Biol Ecol, 219, SPEC. ISSUE, (1998)
[3]  
Carver C.E.A., Mallet A.L., Estimating the carrying capacity of a coastal inlet for mussel culture, Aquaculture, 88, pp. 39-53, (1990)
[4]  
Christensen V., Pauly D., Changes in models of aquatic ecosystems approaching carrying capacity, Ecol Appl, 8, 1 SUPPL., (1998)
[5]  
Dame R.F., Prins T.C., Bivalve carrying capacity in coastal ecosystems, Aquat Ecol, 31, pp. 409-421, (1998)
[6]  
Dankers N., Integrated estuarine management - Obtaining a sustainable yield of bivalve resources while maintaining environmental quality, Bivalve Filter Feeders in Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystem Processes, pp. 479-512, (1993)
[7]  
Errington P.L., Vulnerability of bobwhite population to predation, Ecology, 15, pp. 110-127, (1936)
[8]  
Ferreira J.G., Duarte P., Ball B., Trophic capacity of Carlingford Lough for oyster culture - Analysis by ecological modelling, Aquat Ecol, 31, pp. 361-378, (1998)
[9]  
Grant J., Dowd M., Thompson K., Emerson C., Hatcher A., Perspectives on field studies and related biological models of bivalve growth and carrying capacity, Bivalve Filter Feeders in Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystem Processes, pp. 371-420, (1993)
[10]  
Heral M., Why carrying capacity models are useful tools for management of bivalve molluscs culture, Bivalve Filter Feeders in Estuarine and Coastal Ecosystem Processes, pp. 455-477, (1993)