To beat or not to beat? The importance of analysts' cash flow forecasts

被引:27
作者
Brown L.D. [1 ]
Huang K. [2 ]
Pinello A.S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Seymour Wolfbein Distinguished Professor, Fox School of Business, Temple University, 1801 Liacouras Walk, Philadelphia, PA
[2] Culverhouse College of Commerce and Business Administration, The University of Alabama, Box 870220, Tuscaloosa, AL
[3] Lutgert College of Business, Florida Gulf Coast University, 10501 FGCU Blvd, South, Fort Myers, FL
关键词
Analyst forecasts; Cash flows; Firm performance; Valuation consequences;
D O I
10.1007/s11156-012-0330-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We investigate the implications of firms' benchmark-beating patterns with respect to analysts' quarterly cash flow forecasts for firms' current capital market valuation and their future performance. We hypothesize that nonnegative earnings surprises are more likely to be supported by real operating performance and signal higher earnings quality if they are achieved via higher than expected cash flows or lower than expected accruals. We show that firms beating analyst earnings forecasts have larger positive capital market reactions and larger earnings response coefficients if they beat analyst cash flow forecasts or report lower than expected accruals. We also demonstrate that these firms' superior future performance may provide an economic justification for their more favorable market response. Our findings suggest that firms' ability to beat analyst cash flow forecasts is informative regarding the quality of their earnings surprises. © 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York.
引用
收藏
页码:723 / 752
页数:29
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Ball, R., Brown, P., An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers (1968) J Account Res, 6 (2), pp. 159-178
[2]  
Bartov, E., Givoly, D., Hayn, C., The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations (2002) J Account Econ, 33 (2), pp. 173-204
[3]  
Bowen, R., Rajgopal, S., Venkatachalam, M., Accounting discretion, corporate governance, and firm performance (2008) Contemp Account Res, 25 (2), pp. 351-405
[4]  
Brown, L., (2007) Thomson financial research bibliography, , Editor, First Edition
[5]  
Brown, L., Caylor, M., A temporal analysis of quarterly earnings thresholds: propensities and valuation consequences (2005) Account Rev, 80 (2), pp. 423-440
[6]  
Brown, L., Kim, K.J., Timely aggregate analyst forecasts as better proxies for market earnings expectations (1991) J Account Res, 29 (2), pp. 382-385
[7]  
Brown, L., Pinello, A., To what extent does the financial reporting process curb earnings surprise games? (2007) J Account Res, 45 (5), pp. 947-981
[8]  
Call, A., Chen, S., Tong, Y., Are analysts' earnings forecasts more accurate when accompanied by cash flow forecasts? (2009) Rev Account Stud, 14 (2-3), pp. 358-391
[9]  
Cheng, A., Hollie, D., Do core and non-core cash flows from operations persist differentially in predicting future cash flows? (2008) Rev Quant Finan Account, 31 (1), pp. 29-53
[10]  
Collins, D., Kothari, S., An analysis of intertemporal and cross-sectional determinants of earnings response coefficients (1989) J Account Econ, 11 (2-3), pp. 143-181