Are guinea pigs rodents? The importance of adequate models in molecular phylogenetics

被引:239
作者
Sullivan J. [1 ,2 ]
Swofford D.L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Laboratory of Molecular Systematics, MSC, Smithsonian Institution, Washington
[2] Department of Biological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow
关键词
Inconsistency; Maximum likelihood; Molecular systematics; Rate heterogeneity; Rodents;
D O I
10.1023/A:1027314112438
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The monophyly of Rodentia has repeatedly been challenged based on several studies of molecular sequence data. Most recently, D'Erchia et al. (1996) analyzed complete mtDNA sequences of 16 mammals and concluded that rodents are not monophyletic. We have reanalyzed these data using maximum-likelihood methods. We use two methods to test for significance of differences among alternative topologies and show that (1) models that incorporate variation in evolutionary rates across sites fit the data dramatically better than models used in the original analyses, (2) the mtDNA data fail to refute rodent monophyly, and (3) the original interpretation of strong support for nonmonophyly results from systematic error associated with an oversimplified model of sequence evolution. These analyses illustrate the importance of incorporating recent theoretical advances into molecular phylogenetic analyses, especially when results of these analyses conflict with classical hypotheses of relationships. © 1997 Plenum Publishing Corporation.
引用
收藏
页码:77 / 86
页数:9
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Adachi J., Hasegawa M., MOLPHY version 2.3: Programs for molecular phylogenetics based on maximum likelihood, Computer Science Monographs, 28, (1996)
[2]  
Cao Y., Adachi J., Yano T., Hasegawa M., Phylogenetic place of guinea pigs
[3]  
no support of the rodent-polyphyly hypothesis from maximum-likelihood analyses of multiple protein sequences, Mol. Biol. Evol., 11, pp. 593-604, (1994)
[4]  
Cao Y., Okada N., Hasegawa H., Phylogenetic position of guinea pigs revisited, Mol. Biol. Evol., 14, pp. 461-464, (1997)
[5]  
D'Erchia A.M., Gissi C., Pesole G., Saccone C., Amason U., The guinea-pig is not a rodent, Nature, 381, pp. 597-600, (1996)
[6]  
Felsenstein J., Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading, Syst. Zool., 27, pp. 401-410, (1978)
[7]  
Gaut B.S., Lewis P.O., Success of maximum likelihood phylogeny inference in the four-taxon case, Mol. Biol. Evol., 12, pp. 152-162, (1995)
[8]  
Goldman N., Statistical tests of models of DNA substitution, J. Mol. Evol., 36, pp. 182-198, (1993)
[9]  
Graur D., Hide W.A., Li W.-H., Is the guinea-pig a rodent?, Nature, 315, pp. 649-652, (1991)
[10]  
Gu X., Fu Y.-X., Li W.-H., Maximum likelihood estimation of the heterogeneity of substitution rate among nucleotide sites, Mol. Biol. Evol., 12, pp. 546-557, (1995)