The case against retrospective statistical power analyses with an introduction to power analysis

被引：85

作者：

Shinichi Nakagawa

T. Mary Foster

机构：

[1] University of Sheffield,Department of Animal and Plant Sciences

[2] University of Waikato,Department of Psychology

来源：

关键词：

Statistical power analysis; Retrospective power analysis; Power approach paradox; Effect size;

D O I：

10.1007/s10211-004-0095-z

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

引用

页码：103 / 108

页数：5

共 45 条

[1]

Berger RL(1996)Bioequivalence trials, intention-union tests and equivalence confidence sets Stat Sci 11 283-319

[2]

Hsu JC(1978)The case against statistical significance testing Harv Educ Rev 48 378-399

[3]

Carver RP(1988)Significance test or effect size? Psychol Bull 103 105-110

[4]

Chow SL(1962)The statistical power of abnormal social psychological research: a review J Abnorm Soc Psychol 65 145-153

[5]

Cohen J(1990)Things I have learned (so far) Am Psychol 45 1304-1312

[6]

Cohen J(1992)Statistical power analysis Curr Dir Psychol Sci 1 98-101

[7]

Cohen J(1994)The earth is round ( Am Psychol 49 997-1003

[8]

Cohen J(2003)<0.05) Behav Ecol 14 446-450

[9]

Colegrave N(1998)Confidence intervals are a more useful complement to nonsignificant tests then are power calculations Science 279 821-822

[10]

Ruxton GD(1991)Reversal of the burden of proof in fisheries management Aust J Mar Freshwater Res 42 555-567