Outcome measures in osteoarthritis: randomized controlled trials.

被引:53
作者
Strand V. [1 ]
Kelman A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Division of Immunology and Rheumatology, Stanford University, 306 Ramona Road, Portola Valley, 94028, CA
关键词
Total Knee Arthroplasty; Rofecoxib; Minimum Clinically Important Difference; Osteoarthritis Cartilage; Glucosamine Sulfate;
D O I
10.1007/s11926-004-0080-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accepted outcome measures in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in osteoarthritis (OA) include patient-reported assessments of physical function and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Available data can inform treatment decisions when statistically significant changes are viewed in terms of clinically important improvements. Patient-reported outcomes validated in OA include global assessments of pain, disease activity, and disease-specific and generic measures of physical function and HRQOL. Definitions of minimum clinically important differences (MCID) have been derived from RCTs with physical therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), and cyclooxygenase-2 selective agents. Definitions of MCID should serve only as guidelines based on mean changes in a treatment group, and do not necessarily reflect clinically meaningful improvements for an individual patient. They help to interpret data across treatments and patient populations. Definitions of MCID may differ for the type of intervention assessed; additional methodologic issues must be addressed when evaluating nonpharmacologic treatments. Based on RCTs in OA evaluating physical therapy, cyclooxygenase-2 agents, and NSAIDs, the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index is valid, reliable, sensitive to change, and correlates closely with the generic Medical Outcomes Survey Short-Form 36 measure of HRQOL. When evaluating RCT data, understanding derivation and MCID values of outcome measures facilitates informed therapeutic decisions regarding therapeutic interventions.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 30
页数:10
相关论文
共 242 条
[1]  
Beaton DE(2003)Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function Clin Orth Rel Res 413 90-105
[2]  
Schemitsch E(1997)Recommendations for a core set of outcome measures for future Phase III clinical trials in knee, hip, and hand osteoarthritis. Consensus development at OMERACT III J Rheumatol 24 799-802
[3]  
Bellamy N(1996)Design and conduct of clinical trails in patients with osteoarthritis: recommendations from a task force of the osteoarthritis research society Osteoarthritis Cartilage 4 217-243
[4]  
Kirwan J(1998)The OMERACT filter for outcome measures in rheumatology [editorial] J Rheumatol 25 198-199
[5]  
Boers M(2003)Response relationship of VAS and Likert scales in osteoarthritis efficacy measurement Osteoarthritis Cartilage 11 499-507
[6]  
Altman R(2000)Assessing global pain severity by self-report in clinical and health services research Spine 25 3140-3151
[7]  
Brandt K(1988)Validation of the WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in osteoarthritis of the hip or knee J Rheumatol 15 1833-1840
[8]  
Hochberg M(1988)Validation of the WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relavent outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in Osteoarthritis J Ortho Rheumatol 1 95-108
[9]  
Moskowitz R(1999)Generic and condition specific outcome measures for people with osteoarthritis of the knee Rheumatology 38 870-877
[10]  
Boers M(2001)The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC): a review of its utility and measurement properties Arth Care Res 45 453-461