The episodic random utility model unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation

被引:30
作者
Craig B.M. [1 ,2 ]
Busschbach J.J.V. [3 ]
机构
[1] Health Outcomes and Behavior Program, Moffitt Cancer Center, MRC-CANCONT, Tampa, FL 33612-9416
[2] Department of Economics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, Fowler St.
[3] Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam
关键词
Discrete Choice; Standard Gamble; Optimal Health; Slope Estimator; Health State Valuation;
D O I
10.1186/1478-7954-7-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: To present an episodic random utility model that unifies time trade-off and discrete choice approaches in health state valuation. Methods: First, we introduce two alternative random utility models (RUMs) for health preferences: the episodic RUM and the more common instant RUM. For the interpretation of time trade-off (TTO) responses, we show that the episodic model implies a coefficient estimator, and the instant model implies a mean slope estimator. Secondly, we demonstrate these estimators and the differences between the estimates for 42 health states using TTO responses from the seminal Measurement and Valuation in Health (MVH) study conducted in the United Kingdom. Mean slopes are estimates with and without Dolan's transformation of worse-than-death (WTD) responses. Finally, we demonstrate an exploded probit estimator, an extension of the coefficient estimator for discrete choice data that accommodates both TTO and rank responses. Results: By construction, mean slopes are less than or equal to coefficients, because slopes are fractions and, therefore, magnify downward errors in WTD responses. The Dolan transformation of WTD responses causes mean slopes to increase in similarity to coefficient estimates, yet they are not equivalent (i.e., absolute mean difference = 0.179). Unlike mean slopes, coefficient estimates demonstrate strong concordance with rank-based predictions (Lin's rho = 0.91). Combining TTO and rank responses under the exploded probit model improves the identification of health state values, decreasing the average width of confidence intervals from 0.057 to 0.041 compared to TTO only results. Conclusion: The episodic RUM expands upon the theoretical framework underlying health state valuation and contributes to health econometrics by motivating the selection of coefficient and exploded probit estimators for the analysis of TTO and rank responses. In future MVH surveys, sample size requirements may be reduced through the incorporation of multiple responses under a single estimator. © 2009 Craig and Busschbach; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Torrence G.W., Multi-attribute utility theory as a method of measuring social preferences for health states in long-term care, Values and Long Term Care, pp. 127-156, (1982)
[2]  
Patrick D.L., Starks H.E., Cain K.C., Uhlmann R.F., Pearlman R.A., Measuring preferences for health states worse than death, Med Decis Making, 14, pp. 9-18, (1994)
[3]  
Mullahy J., The Anatomy of Healthcare Cost Distributions, 2nd Biennial Conference of the American Society of Health Economists, (2008)
[4]  
Craig B.M., Ramachandran S., Relative risk of a shuffled deck: A generalizable logical consistency criterion for sample selection in health state valuation studies, Health Econ, 15, pp. 835-848, (2006)
[5]  
Craig B.M., Busschbach J.J.V., Salomon J.A., Ranking, Time Trade-Off and Visual Analogue Scale Values for EQ-5D Health States, Under Review, (2008)
[6]  
Busschbach J.J.V., Weijnen T., Nieuwenhuizen M., Oppe S., Badia X., Dolan P., Greiner W., Kind P., Krabbe P., Ohinmaa A., Et al., A comparison of EQ-5D time trade-off values obtained in Germany, The United Kingdom and Spain, The Measurement and Valuation of Health Status Using EQ-5D: A European Perspective, pp. 143-165, (2003)
[7]  
Stalmeier P.F., Busschbach J.J., Lamers L.M., Krabbe P.F., The gap effect: Discontinuities of preferences around dead, Health Econ, 14, pp. 679-685, (2005)
[8]  
Salomon J.A., Reconsidering the use of rankings in the valuation of health states: A model for estimating cardinal values from ordinal data, Popul Health Metr, 1, (2003)
[9]  
McCabe C., Brazier J., Gilks P., Tsuchiya A., Roberts J., O'Hagan A., Stevens K., Using rank data to estimate health state utility models, J Health Econ, 25, pp. 418-431, (2006)
[10]  
Krabbe P.F., Stalmeier P.F., Lamers L.M., Busschbach J.J., Testing the interval-level measurement property of multi-item visual analogue scales, Qual Life Res, 15, pp. 1651-1661, (2006)