Laparoscopic colectomy

被引:11
作者
Chang G.J. [1 ]
Nelson H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905
关键词
Diverticular Disease; Laparoscopic Colectomy; Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery; Open Colectomy; Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision;
D O I
10.1007/s11894-005-0010-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Minimally invasive surgical techniques are preferred for a variety of surgical disorders and result in improved outcomes. Laparoscopic colectomy is associated with decreased postoperative pain, faster ileus resolution, shorter hospitalization, and improved cosmesis when compared with open colectomy. The laparoscopic technique is now often preferred for benign disease, but concerns over oncologic adequacy have limited its availability for cancer. The Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for cancer recently validated the efficacy of laparoscopy for colon cancer. Limitations include the technical requirements of advanced laparoscopic skills and training, increased operative time, and equipment costs. Surgeons performing laparoscopic colectomy should be adequately experienced and certified to ensure successful outcomes. Despite these limitations, patient recovery benefits may offset the increased operative costs and result in improved cost-effectiveness overall. Copyright © 2005 by Current Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:396 / 403
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer, N. Engl. J. Med., 350, pp. 2050-2059, (2004)
[2]  
Chang Y.J., Marcello P.W., Rusin L.C., Et al., Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: Helping hand or hindrance?, Surg. Endosc., 19, pp. 656-661, (2005)
[3]  
Lacy A.M., Garcia-Valdecasas J.C., Delgado S., Et al., Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: A randomised trial, Lancet, 359, pp. 2224-2229, (2002)
[4]  
Leung K.A., Kwok S.P., Lam S.C.W., Et al., Laparoscopic resection of rectosigmoid carcinoma: Prospective randomised trial, Lancet, 363, pp. 1187-1192, (2004)
[5]  
Milsom J.W., Bohm B., Hammerhofer K.A., Et al., A prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: A preliminary report, J. Am. Coll. Surg., 187, pp. 46-54, (1998)
[6]  
Stage J.G., Schulze S., Moller P., Et al., Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma, Br. J. Surg., 84, pp. 391-396, (1997)
[7]  
Braga M., Vignali A., Gianotti L., Et al., Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery: A randomized trial on short-term outcome, Ann. Surg., 236, pp. 759-766, (2002)
[8]  
Hasegawa H., Kabeshima Y., Watanabe M., Et al., Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for advanced colorectal cancer, Surg. Endosc., 17, pp. 636-640, (2003)
[9]  
Marusch F., Gastinger I., Schneider C., Et al., Importance of conversion for results obtained with laparoscopic colorectal surgery, Dis. Colon Rectum, 44, pp. 207-214, (2001)
[10]  
Scheidbach H., Schneider C., Rose J., Et al., Laparoscopic approach to treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis: Changes in the spectrum of indications and results of a prospective, multicenter study on 1,545 patients, Dis. Colon Rectum, 47, pp. 1883-1888, (2004)