The first year follow-up after colorectal adenoma polypectomy is important: A multiple-center study in symptomatic hospital-based individuals in China

被引：96

作者：

Gao Q.-Y. ^{[1
]}

Chen H.-M. ^{[1
]}

Sheng J.-Q. ^{[2
]}

Zheng P. ^{[3
]}

Yu C.-G. ^{[4
]}

Jiang B. ^{[5
]}

Fang J.-Y. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Gastroenterology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Institute of Digestive Disease

[2] Department of Gastroenterology, PLA. The Military General Hospital of Beijing

[3] Shanghai 1st Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

[4] Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School

[5] Department of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Nanfang University

来源：

Frontiers of Medicine in China | 2010年 / 4卷 / 4期

关键词：

colorectal adenoma; follow-up; polypectomy; recurrence; risk factor;

D O I：

10.1007/s11684-010-0200-9

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

The recurrence of colorectal adenoma (CRA) is high. Although there are guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy in other countries, little is known about its recurrence rate and recurrence peak, especially in China. The aim of the present research is to investigate how long after polypectomy follow-up should take and to analyze risk factors of recurrence. 1208 patients who received polypectomies from five clinical research centers in four regions of China (Shanghai, Guangzhou, Nanjing and Beijing) were included. They were divided into 4 groups: group A (follow-up≤1 year after polypectomy), group B (follow-up 2-3 years after polypectomy), group C (follow-up 4-5 years after polypectomy), and group D (follow-up < 5 years after polypectomy). The sex, age, adenoma location, size, number, and pathological characteristics were compared. On the whole, the recurrence rate was 59.46% in group A, 61.09% in group B, 78.07% in group C, and 87.12% in group D, which indicated an increased tendency with a prolonged follow-up duration. There was a significant difference between group A and C or D, and between group B and C or D (P<0.01), but there was no statistical difference between group A and B. Additionally, the recurrent patients in the first year had a recurrence rate of 97.33% in the first three years (59.46/61.09), which means that the peak of recurrence was almost entirely concentrated in the first year. The recurrence rate was higher in males and the elder. The risk factors included multiple numbers, villous feature, high-grade dysplasia of medium or smaller size and location in the distal colon. In conclusion, the peak of recurrence was almost totally concentrated in the first year; meanwhile, the first year follow-up is of critical importance in China. It may not be necessary to do the follow-up examination during the second and third years, but after three years, another colonoscopy should be undertaken. © 2010 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

引用

页码：436 / 442

页数：6

共 20 条

[1]

Lieberman D.A., Weiss D.G., Bond J.H., Ahnen D.J., Garewal H., Chejfec G., Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380, N Engl J Med, 343, 3, pp. 162-168, (2000)

[2]

Cotton S., Sharp L., Little J., The adenoma-carcinoma sequence and prospects for the prevention of colorectal neoplasia, Crit Rev Oncog, 7, 5-6, pp. 293-342, (1996)

[3]

Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Ho M.N., O'Brien M.J., Gottlieb L.S., Sternberg S.S., Waye J.D., Schapiro M., Bond J.H., Panish J.F., Ackroyd F., Shike M., Kurtz R.C., Hornsby-Lewis L., Gerdes H., Stewart E.T., Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy, N Engl J Med, 329, 27, pp. 1977-1981, (1993)

[4]

Strul H., Kariv R., Leshno M., Halak A., Jakubowicz M., Santo M., Umansky M., Shirin H., Degani Y., Revivo M., Halpern Z., Arber N., The prevalence rate and anatomic location of colorectal adenoma and cancer detected by colonoscopy in average-risk individuals aged 40-80 years, Am J Gastroenterol, 101, 2, pp. 255-262, (2006)

[5]

Selby J.V., Friedman G.D., Quesenberry Jr. C.P., Weiss N.S., A casecontrol study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer, N Engl J Med, 326, 10, pp. 653-657, (1992)

[6]

Newcomb P.A., Norfleet R.G., Storer B.E., Surawicz T.S., Marcus P.M., Screening sigmoidscopy and colorectal cancer mortality, J Natl Cancer Inst, 84, pp. 1572-1575, (1992)

[7]

Martinez M.E., Baron J.A., Lieberman D.A., Schatzkin A., Lanza E., Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Jiang R., Ahnen D.J., Bond J.H., Church T.R., Robertson D.J., Smith-Warner S.A., Jacobs E.T., Alberts D.S., Greenberg E.R., A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy, Gastroenterology, 136, 3, pp. 832-841, (2009)

[8]

Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., O'Brien M.J., Ho M.N., Gottlieb L.S., Sternberg S.S., Waye J.D., Bond J.H., Schapiro M., Stewart E.T., Panish J.F., Ackroyd F., Kurtz R.C., Shike M., Randomized comparison of surveillance intervals after colonoscopic removal of newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps, N Engl J Med, 328, 13, pp. 901-906, (1993)

[9]

Jorgensen O.D., Kronborg O., Fenger C., A randomized surveillance study of patients with pedunculated and small sessile tubular and tubulovillous adenomas. The Funen Adenoma Follow-up Study, Scand J Gastroenterol, 30, 7, pp. 686-692, (1995)

[10]

Winawer S.J., Zauber A.G., Fletcher R.H., Stillman J.S., O'Brien M.J., Levin B., Smith R.A., Lieberman D.A., Burt R.W., Levin T.R., Bond J.H., Brooks D., Byers T., Hyman N., Kirk L., Thorson A., Simmang C., Johnson D., Rex D.K., Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society, Gastroenterology, 130, 6, pp. 1872-1885, (2006)

← 1 2 →