Repair of ventral hernias in morbidly obese patients undergoing laparoscopic gastric bypass should not be deferred

被引:91
作者
Eid G.M. [1 ,2 ]
Mattar S.G. [1 ,2 ]
Hamad G. [1 ,2 ]
Cottam D.R. [1 ,2 ]
Lord J.L. [1 ,2 ]
Watson A. [1 ,2 ]
Dallal R.M. [1 ,2 ]
Schauer P.R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Minimally Invasive Center, Department of Surgery,, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Suite 5500,, Magee-Women's Hospital,, Pittsburgh, PA 15213,, 300 Halket Street,
[2] Veterans Administration Pittsburgh Healthcare System,, University Drive,, PA 15240,, Pittsburgh,
来源
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques | 2004年 / 18卷 / 2期
关键词
Laparoscopic gastric bypass; Morbid obesity; Small intestine submucosa; Ventral hernias;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-003-8915-1
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment of ventral hernias in patients who present for weight loss surgery. Methods: Medical records of consecutive morbidly obese patients who underwent laparoscopic Roux-en-Y (LRYGB) gastric bypass with a secondary diagnosis of ventral hernia were reviewed. Only patients who were beyond 6 months of follow-up were included. Results: The study population was 85 patients. There were three groups of patients according to the method of repair: primary repair (59), small intestine submucosa (SIS) (12), and deferred treatment (14). Average follow-up was 26 months. There was a 22% recurrence in the primary repair group. There were no recurrences in the SIS group. Five of the patients in the deferred treatment group (37.5%) presented with small bowel obstruction due to incarceration. Conclusion: Biomaterial mesh (SIS) repair of ventral hernias concomitant with LRYGB resulted in the most favorable outcome albeit having short follow-up. Concomitant primary repair is associated with a high rate of recurrence. All incarcerated ventral hernias should be repaired concomitant with LRYGB, as deferment may result in small bowel obstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 210
页数:3
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Anthony T., Bergen P.C., Kim L.T., Henderson M., Fahey T., Rege R.V., Turnage R.H., Factors affecting recurrence following incisional herniorrhaphy, World J Surg, 24, pp. 95-101, (2000)
[2]  
Birgisson G., Park A.E., Mastrangelo M.J., Witzke D.B., Chu U.B., Obesity and Laparoscopic repair of ventral hernias, Surg Endosc, 15, pp. 1419-1422, (2001)
[3]  
Clarke K.M., Lantz G.C., Salisbury S.K., Badylak S.F., Hiles M.C., Voytik S.L., Intsetine submucosa and polypropylene mesh for abdominal wall repair in dogs, J Surg Res, 60, pp. 107-114, (1996)
[4]  
Cleveland R.D., Zitsch R.P., Laws H.L., Incisional closure in morbidly obese patients, Am Surg, 55, pp. 1-63, (1989)
[5]  
Costanza M.J., Heniford B.T., Area M.J., Mayes J.T., Gagner M., Laparoscopic repair of recurrent ventral hernias, Am Surg, 64, pp. 1121-1127, (1998)
[6]  
Dalla Vechia L., Engum S., Kogon B., Jensen E., Davis M., Grosfeld J., Evaluation of small intestine submucosa and acellular dermis as diaphragmatic prostheses, J Pediatr Surg, 34, pp. 167-171, (1999)
[7]  
Dayton M.T., Buchele B.A., Shirazi S.S., Hunt L.B., Use of an absorbable mesh to repair contaminated abdominal wall defects, Arch Surg, 121, pp. 954-960, (1986)
[8]  
Israelsson L.A., Johnsson T., Overweight and healing of midline incisions: The importance of suture technique, Eur J Surg, 163, pp. 175-180, (1997)
[9]  
Liakakos T., Kararikas H., Panagiotidis H., Dendrinos S., Use of marlex mesh in the repair of recurrent incisional hernia, Br J Surg, 81, pp. 284-289, (1994)
[10]  
Raftopoulos I., Vanuno D., Khorsand J., Ninos J., Kouraklis G., Lasky P., Outcome of laparoscopic ventral hernia repair in correlation with obesity, type of hernia, and hernia size, J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech, 12, pp. 425-429, (2002)