Principal-agent problems in international organizations

被引:9
作者
Vaubel R. [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Mannheim
关键词
International organizations; Principal-agent problem;
D O I
10.1007/s11558-006-8340-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper provides a framework for analysing control problems in international organisations and reviews the disparate evidence from a public-choice perspective. Most examples concern the European Union the International Monetary Fund the World Bank and the International Labour Organisation. International organisations suffer from principal-agent problems more than other public or private organisations do because the chain of delegation is more extended. As survey evidence demonstrates the actors in international organisations do not share the preferences of the citizens because they have vested interests and the citizens believe that they have least influence at the international level. The paper argues that national and international parliaments the national governments and international supervisory boards or courts cannot solve the principal-agent problem due to severe information cost and weak or distorted incentives. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:125 / 138
页数:13
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Alter K.J., Delegating to international courts, Utah Conference on Delegation to International Organizations, (2002)
[2]  
Andersen S.S., Eliasson K.A., European community lobbying, European Journal of Political Research, 20, pp. 173-187, (1991)
[3]  
Artis M.J., How accurate is the world economic outlook?, Staff Studies for the World Economic Outlook, (1988)
[4]  
Besley T., Case A., Incumbent behavior: Vote-seeking, tax setting, and yardstick competition, American Economic Review, 85, pp. 25-45, (1995)
[5]  
Boockmann B., Vaubel R., The Theory of Raising Rivals' Costs and Evidence from the International Labor Organization, (2006)
[6]  
Brunner K., Meltzer A.H., Money and the Economy Issues in Monetary Analysis, (1990)
[7]  
Cole R.L., Kincaid J., Alejandro R., Public opinion on federalism and federal political culture in Canada, Mexico, and the United States, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 34.2, pp. 201-221, (2004)
[8]  
Craine M.W., McCormick R.E., Regulators as an interest group, The Theory of Public Choice - II, pp. 287-304, (1984)
[9]  
Dahl R.A., Tufte E.R., Size and Democracy, (1973)
[10]  
Dreher A., Vaubel R., Do IMF and IBRD cause moral hazard and political business cycles? Evidence from panel data, Open Economies Review, 15, pp. 1-22, (2004)