Towards a Formal Account of Reasoning about Evidence: Argumentation Schemes and Generalisations

被引：98

作者：

Floris Bex

Henry Prakken

Chris Reed

Douglas Walton

机构：

[1] Utrecht University,Institute of Information and Computing Sciences

[2] University of Groningen,Faculty of Law

[3] University of Dundee,Division of Applied Computing

[4] University of Winnipeg,Department of Philosophy

来源：

Artificial Intelligence and Law | 2003年 / 11卷 / 2-3期

关键词：

Artificial Intelligence; General Theory; Computational Linguistic; Legal Aspect; Argumentation Scheme;

D O I：

10.1023/B:ARTI.0000046007.11806.9a

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper studies the modelling of legal reasoning about evidence within general theories of defeasible reasoning and argumentation. In particular, Wigmore's method for charting evidence and its use by modern legal evidence scholars is studied in order to give a formal underpinning in terms of logics for defeasible argumentation. Two notions turn out to be crucial, viz. argumentation schemes and empirical generalisations.

引用

页码：125 / 165

页数：40

共 21 条

[1]

Dung P. M.(1995)On the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning, Logic Programming, and n-Person Games Artificial Intelligence 77 321-357

[2]

Hage J. C.(1996)A Theory of Legal Reasoning and a Logic to Match Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 199-273

[3]

Jøsang A.(2000)Legal Reasoning With Subjective Logic Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 289-315

[4]

Bondi V. A.(1995)A logic of Argumentation for Reasoning Under Uncertainty Computational Intelligence 11 113-131

[5]

Krause P.(1986)The New Evidence Scholarship: Analyzing the Process of Proof Boston University Law Review 66 439-477

[6]

Ambler S.(1995)Rationales and Argument Moves Artificial Intelligence and Law 3 159-189

[7]

Elvang-Gøransson M.(2001)Get on Board for the Ride of Your Life!The Ups, the Downs, the Twists, and the Turns of the Applicability of the ''Gatekeeper ''Function to Scientific and Non-Scientific Expert Evidence Akron Law Review 34 689-739

[8]

Fox J.(1987)Defeasible reasoning Cognitive Science 11 481-518

[9]

Lempert R.(1998)Perceiving and Reasoning About a Changing World Computational Intelligence 14 498-562

[10]

Loui R. P.(2004)Analysing Reasoning About Evidence With Formal Models of Argumentation Law, Probability and Risk 3 33-50

← 1 2 3 →