Methodology and Application of the Combined SWAT-HSPF Model

被引：6

作者：

Ali I. ^{[1
]}

Bruen M. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Ministry of Water Resources and Electricity, Republic of the Sudan, P O Box 878, Khartoum

[2] Centre for Water Resources Research, University College Dublin, Newstead, Belfield

来源：

Environmental Processes | 2016年 / 3卷 / 3期

关键词：

HSPF; Phosphorus modelling; Sensitivity analysis; SWAT; Uncertainty analysis;

D O I：

10.1007/s40710-016-0167-x

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper shows the output of a research study that involves developing a new model for diffuse source pollution requiring the integration of a complex distributed catchment model with a model of contaminant transport. It explains in details the various model components, modifications and assumptions that have been made in the construction of the new combined model (NCM) based on Hydrological modules of Hydrological Simulation Program FORTRAN (HSPF) and Phosphorus transformations modules of Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model, as well as the approach adopted. Three Irish catchments have been tested, namely Oona, Bawn and Dripsey. Model performance for both calibration and validation periods, and model parameter sensitivity and uncertainty analysis results were examined extensively with the outputs of SWAT model and HSPF. The NCM showed promising potential for better estimation of phosphorus losses from catchments for Irish conditions with some drawback for baseflow dominant catchments. It gives good results in terms of flow and phosphorus modelling, and is generally better than SWAT or HSPF alone for most of the cases tested. An uncertainty analysis based on model parameters was conducted using the PARASOL method implemented in SWAT 2005, and uncertainty bounds for the flow and the total P load predictions were compared with the observed values for each catchment. © 2016, Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

引用

页码：645 / 661

页数：16

共 19 条

[1]

Ali I.S., Improved semi distributed modeling of Phosphorus losses from catchment, PhD Thesis, (2010)

[2]

Allen R.G., Jensen M.E., Wright J.L., Burman R.D., Operational estimates of evapotranspiration, Agron J, 81, pp. 650-662, (1989)

[3]

Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Mttiah R.S., Williams J.R., Large area hydrologic modelling and assessment part I: model development, J Am Water Resour Assoc (JAWRA), 34, 1, pp. 73-89, (1998)

[4]

Bicknell B.R., Imhoff J.C., Kittle J.L., Jobes T.H., Donigian A.S., Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF). User’s manual for release 12U.S. EPA National Exposure Research Laboratory, Athens, GA, in cooperation with U.S, Geological Survey, (2001)

[5]

Duan Q., Gupta V.K., Sorooshian S., Effective and efficient global optimisation for conceptual rainfall-runoff models, Water Resour Res, 28, pp. 1015-1031, (1992)

[6]

Eckhardt K., Haverkamp S., Fohrer N., Frede H.G., SWAT-G a version of SWAT99 modified for application to low mountain range catchments, Phys Chem Earth, 27, 9-10, pp. 641-644, (2002)

[7]

Hargreaves G.H., Samani Z.A., Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature, Appl Eng Agric, 1, pp. 96-99, (1985)

[8]

Kim N.W., Chung I.M., Won Y.S., Arnold J.G., Development and application of the integrated SWAT-MODFLOW model, J Hydrol, 356, pp. 1-16, (2008)

[9]

Mathevet T., Michel C., Andreassian V., Perrin C., A bounded version of the Nash-Sutcliffe criterion for better model assessment on large sets of basins, Large sample basin experiments of hydrological model parameterization: results of the model parameter experiment-MOPEX. IAHS Red Book Publication, 307, pp. 211-219, (2006)

[10]

McDonald M.G., Harbaugh M.G., A modular three-dimensional finite-difference ground water flow model. United State Geological Survey, Techniques of Water Resources Investigation Book 6, Chapter, A1, (1988)

← 1 2 →