Mathematical modelling of anaerobic reactors treating domestic wastewater: Rational criteria for model use

被引:92
作者
Batstone D.J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Environment and Resources, DTU, Technical University of Denmark, DK2800, Kgs Lyngby, Bygningstorvet
关键词
Anaerobic Digestion; Sewage System; Domestic Wastewater; Domestic Sewage; Anaerobic Treatment;
D O I
10.1007/s11157-005-7191-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Anaerobic digestion modelling is an established method for assessing anaerobic wastewater treatment for design, systems analysis, operational analysis, and control. Anaerobic treatment of domestic wastewater is a relatively new, but rapidly maturing technology, especially in developing countries, where the combination of low cost, and moderate-good performance are particularly attractive. The key emerging technology is high-rate anaerobic treatment, particularly UASB reactors. Systems modelling can potentially offer a number of advantages to this field, and the key motivations for modelling have been identified as operational analysis, technology development, and model-based design. Design is particularly important, as it determines capital cost, a key motivation for implementers. Published modelling studies for anaerobic domestic sewage treatment are limited in number, but well directed at specific issues. Most have a low structural complexity, with first order kinetics, as compared to the more commonly used Monod kinetics. This review addresses the use of anaerobic models in general, application of models to domestic sewage systems, and evaluates future requirements for models that need to address the key motivations of operational analysis, technology development, and model-based design. For operational analysis and technology development, a complex model such as the ADM1 is recommended, with further extensions as required to address factors such as sulphate reduction. For design, the critical issSues are hydraulics and particles (i.e., biomass and solid substrate) modelling. Therefore, the kinetic structure should be relatively simple (at least two-step), but the hydraulic and particulate model should be relatively complex. © Springer 2006.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 71
页数:14
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Angelidaki I., Ellegaard L., Ahring B.K., A comprehensive model of anaerobic bioconversion of complex substrates to biogas, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 63, pp. 363-372, (1999)
[2]  
Barber W.P., Stuckey D.C., The use of the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment: A review, Water Res., 33, pp. 1559-1578, (1999)
[3]  
Barker D.J., Salvi S.M.L., Langenhoff A.A.M., Stuckey D.C., Soluble microbial products in ABR treating low-strength wastewater, J. Environ. Eng. ASCE, 126, pp. 239-249, (2000)
[4]  
Batstone D.J., Hernandez J.L.A., Schmidt J.E., Hydraulics of laboratory and full-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 91, pp. 387-391, (2005)
[5]  
Batstone D.J., Keller J., Angelidaki I., Kalyuzhnyi S.V., Pavlostathis S.G., Rozzi A., Sanders W.T.M., Siegrist H., Vavilin V.A., Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1), IWA Task Group for Mathematical Modelling of Anaerobic Digestion Processes, (2002)
[6]  
Batstone D.J., Keller J., Blackall L.L., The influence of substrate kinetics on the microbial community structure in granular anaerobic biomass, Water Res., 38, pp. 1390-1404, (2004)
[7]  
Batstone D.J., Keller J., Newell R.B., Newland M., Modelling anaerobic degradation of complex wastewater. I: Model development, Biores. Technol., 75, pp. 67-74, (2000)
[8]  
Batstone D.J., Pind P.F., Angelidaki I., Kinetics of thermophilic, anaerobic oxidation of straight and branched chain butyrate and valerate, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 84, pp. 195-204, (2003)
[9]  
Bernard O., Polit M., Hadj-Sadok Z., Pengov M., Dochain D., Estaben M., Advanced monitoring and control of anaerobic wastewater treatment plants: Software sensors and controllers for an anaerobic digester, Water Sci. Technol., 43, pp. 175-182, (2001)
[10]  
Bolle W.L., Van Breugel J., Van Eybergen G., Kossen N., Van Gils W., An integral dynamic model for the UASB reactor, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 28, pp. 1621-1636, (1986)