Iron biofortification of rice using different transgenic approaches

被引:3
作者
Hiroshi Masuda
May Sann Aung
Naoko K Nishizawa
机构
[1] Ishikawa Prefectural University,Research Institute for Bioresources and Biotechnology
[2] The University of Tokyo,Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences
来源
Rice | 2013年 / 6卷
关键词
Biofortification; Iron; Zinc; Transgenic rice; Nicotianamine; YSL; Ferritin; IDS3; Mugineic acids; Anemia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
More than 2 billion people suffer from iron (Fe) deficiency, and developing crop cultivars with an increased concentration of micronutrients (biofortification) can address this problem. In this review, we describe seven transgenic approaches, and combinations thereof, that can be used to increase the concentration of Fe in rice seeds. The first approach is to enhance the Fe storage capacity of grains through expression of the Fe storage protein ferritin under the control of endosperm-specific promoters. Using this approach, the concentration of Fe in the seeds of transformants was increased by approximately 2-fold in polished seeds. The second approach is to enhance Fe translocation by overproducing the natural metal chelator nicotianamine; using this approach, the Fe concentration was increased by up to 3-fold in polished seeds. The third approach is to enhance Fe influx to the endosperm by expressing the Fe(II)-nicotianamine transporter gene OsYSL2 under the control of an endosperm-specific promoter and sucrose transporter promoter, which increased the Fe concentration by up to 4-fold in polished seeds. The fourth approach is introduction of the barley mugineic acid synthesis gene IDS3 to enhance Fe uptake and translocation within plants, which resulted in a 1.4-fold increase in the Fe concentration in polished seeds during field cultivation. In addition to the above approaches, Fe-biofortified rice was produced using a combination of the first, second, and third approaches. The Fe concentration in greenhouse-grown T2 polished seeds was 6-fold higher and that in paddy field-grown T3 polished seeds was 4.4-fold higher than in non-transgenic seeds without any reduction in yield. When the first and fourth approaches were combined, the Fe concentration was greater than that achieved by introducing only the ferritin gene, and Fe-deficiency tolerance was observed. With respect to Fe biofortification, the introduction of multiple Fe homeostasis genes is more effective than the introduction of individual genes. Moreover, three additional approaches, i.e., overexpression of the Fe transporter gene OsIRT1 or OsYSL15, overexpression of the Fe deficiency-inducible bHLH transcription factor OsIRO2, and knockdown of the vacuolar Fe transporter gene OsVIT1 or OsVIT2, may be useful to further increase the Fe concentration of seeds.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 432 条
[1]  
Anuradha K(2012)Mapping QTLs and candidate genes for iron and zinc concentrations in unpolished rice of Madhukar×Swarna RILs Gene 508 233-240
[2]  
Agarwal S(2003)The sucrose transporter gene family in rice Plant Cell Physiol 44 223-232
[3]  
Rao YV(2009)OsYSL18 is a rice iron(III)-deoxymugineic acid transporter specifically expressed in reproductive organs and phloem of lamina joints Plant Mol Biol 70 681-692
[4]  
Rao KV(2013)Iron biofortification of Myanmar rice Front Plant Sci 4 158-32402
[5]  
Viraktamath BC(2006)Cloning and characterization of deoxymugineic acid synthase genes from graminaceous plants J Biol Chem 281 32395-130
[6]  
Sarla N(2010)Iron uptake and loading into rice grains Rice 3 122-25
[7]  
Aoki N(2013)The knockdown of OsVIT2 and MIT2 affects iron localization in rice seed Rice 6 31-349
[8]  
Hirose T(2010)Release of plant-borne flavonoids into the rhizosphere and their role in plant nutrition Plant Soil 329 1-53
[9]  
Scofield NG(2001)Maize yellow stripe1 encodes a membrane protein directly involved in Fe (III) uptake Nature 409 346-286
[10]  
Whitfeld RP(2012)Constitutive expression of a barley Fe phytosiderophore transporter increases alkaline soil tolerance and results in iron partitioning between vegetative and storage tissues under stress Plant Physiol Biochem 53 46-386