Current treatment and future directions in neuroblastoma

被引:7
作者
Yoshiaki Tsuchida
Toshiji Shitara
Minoru Kuroiwa
Hitoshi Ikeda
机构
[1] Gunma Children’s Medical Center,Department of Hematology/Oncology
[2] Dokkyo University School of Medicine Koshigaya Hospital,Department of Pediatric Surgery
[3] Dokkyo University School of Medicine Koshigaya Hospital,Department of Surgery
[4] Gunma Children’s Medical Center,undefined
关键词
Neuroblastoma; Pathology classification; MYCN-amplification; Irinotecan; Endostatin;
D O I
10.1007/BF02723804
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Objective : The International Neuroblastoma Staging System (INSS) and Pathology Classification (INPC) were applied to analyze the results of treatment of 644 patients with neuroblastoma treated in Japan during the years from 1995 to 1999, and it was found that the pathology classification (INPC) showed the strongest relevance to prognosis compared to other factors such as stage,MYNC amplification, DNA ploidy and 1p-deletion. Current results of treatment for advanced neuroblastoma are still not satisfactory, so innovative therapeutic methods have been sought during the past 10 years.Methods : Prospects for irinotecan and recombinant human endostatin (rhEndostatin) were studied experimentally and clinically.Results. Irinotecan is a water-soluble derivative of camptothecin, which is isolated from a Chinese tree,Camptotheca acuminata; Its effectiveness against neuroblastoma was confirmed byin vivo preclinical studies, and phase I clinical trials in Japan concluded the maximum tolerated dose of this agent is 160–180 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days, repeated after 25 days off. Phase II trials with this dose began, and we could obtain some encouraging results with the clinical use of irinotecan. rhEndostatin has been studied inin vivo experimental models. The action of rhEndostatin was quite different from those of other cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents, and continuous administration of this substance showed a more marked anti-effect than its intermittent use.Conclusion : Irinotecan appears to be promising when it is given to the patients neuroblastoma, whereas rhEndostatin needs to have more preclinical studies before it is used in patients.
引用
收藏
页码:809 / 812
页数:3
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Ikeda H(2002)Experience with the International Neuroblastoma Staging System and Pathology Classification Br J Cancer 85 1110-1116
[2]  
Tsuchida Y(2002)Intensified chemotherapy increases the survival rates in patients with stage 4 neuroblastoma with J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 24 613-621
[3]  
Iehara T(1999) amplification N Engl J Med 341 1165-1173
[4]  
Kaneko M(2000)Treatment of high-risk neuroblastoma with intensive chemotherapy, radiotherapy, autologous bone marrow transplantation, and 13-cis-retinoic acid Med Pediatr Oncol 34 80-81
[5]  
Tsuchida Y(1994)Evaluation of the results of neuroblastoma screening at six months of age Med Pediatr Oncol 23 487-492
[6]  
Mugishima H(1998)Effects of CPT-11 on a highly malignant xeno-transplanted neuroblastoma Cancer Lett 124 15-21
[7]  
Matthay KK(2002)Oral versus intraperitoneal administration of irinotecan in the treatment of human neuroblastoma in nude mice J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 24 94-100
[8]  
Villablanca JG(1999)Phase I study of irinotecan in pediatric patients with malignant solid tumors J Clin Oncol 17 1815-1824
[9]  
Seeger RC(2000)Direct translation of a protracted irinotecan schedule from a xenograft model to phase I trial in children Med Pediatr Oncol 35 170-170
[10]  
Tsuchida Y(2001)Phase I trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) in children: Final results Clin Cancer Res 7 32-37