Relation of urbanization to stream fish assemblages and species traits in nine metropolitan areas of the United States

被引:24
作者
Brown L.R. [1 ]
Gregory M.B. [2 ]
May J.T. [1 ]
机构
[1] U.S. Geological Survey, Sacramento, CA 95819-6129, Placer Hall
[2] U.S. Geological Survey, Atlanta, GA 30360-2824
关键词
Fish assemblages; Fish traits; Land use; Urban streams; Urbanization;
D O I
10.1007/s11252-009-0082-2
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We examined associations of fish assemblages and fish traits with urbanization and selected environmental variables in nine major United States metropolitan areas. The strongest relations between fishes and urbanization occurred in the metropolitan areas of Atlanta, Georgia; Birmingham, Alabama; Boston, Massachusetts; and Portland, Oregon. In these areas, environmental variables with strong associations (rs ≥ 0.70) with fish assemblages and fish traits tended to have strong associations with urbanization. Relations of urbanization with fish assemblages and fish traits were weaker in Denver, Colorado; Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas; Milwaukee-Green Bay, Wisconsin; and Raleigh, North Carolina. Environmental variables associated with fishes varied among the metropolitan areas. The metropolitan areas with poor relations may have had a limited range of possible response because of previous landscape disturbances. Given the complexities of urban landscapes in different metropolitan areas, our results indicate that caution is warranted when generalizing about biological responses to urbanization. © Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009.
引用
收藏
页码:391 / 416
页数:25
相关论文
共 79 条
[1]  
Alberti M., Booth D., Hill K., Coburn B., Avolio C., Coe S., Spirandelli D., The impact of urban patterns on aquatic ecosystems: An empirical analysis in Puget lowland sub-basins, Landsc Urban Plan, 80, pp. 345-361, (2007)
[2]  
Bilton D.T., Freeland J.R., Okamura F., Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates, Annu Rev Ecol Syst, 32, pp. 159-181, (2001)
[3]  
Blanck A., Tedesco P.A., Lamouroux N., Relationships between life-history strategies of European freshwater fish species and their habitat preferences, Freshw Biol, 52, pp. 843-859, (2007)
[4]  
Effects of Urbanization on Stream Ecosystems, (2005)
[5]  
Bryant W.L., Goodbred S.L., Leiker T.L., Inouye L., Johnson B.T., Use of chemical analysis and assays of semipermeable membrane devices extracts to assess the response of bioavailable organic pollutants in streams to urbanization in six metropolitan areas of the United States, Scientific Investigations Report, pp. 2007-5113, (2007)
[6]  
Carlisle D.M., Hawkins C.P., Meador M.R., Potapova M., Falcone J., Biological assessments of Appalachian streams based on predictive models for fish, macroinvertebrate, and diatom assemblages, J N Am Benthol Soc, 27, pp. 16-37, (2008)
[7]  
Clarke K.R., Gorley R.N., PRIMER v6: User Manual/Tutorial, (2006)
[8]  
Coles J.F., Cuffney T.F., McMahon G., The effects of urbanization on the biological, physical, and chemical characteristics of coastal New England streams, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1695, (2004)
[9]  
Couch C.A., Hamilton P.A., Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems. U.S, Geological Survey Professional Paper 1695, (2002)
[10]  
Cuffney T.F., Brightbill R.A., Methods for processing and summarizing time-series temperature data collected as a part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program studies on the effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems. U.S, Geological Survey Open File Report Series, pp. 2008-330, (2008)